From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mike Snitzer Subject: Re: dm-cache questions Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 10:06:44 -0500 Message-ID: <20131211150644.GA28188@redhat.com> References: <093f01cef54a$fdf044d0$f9d0ce70$@acm.org> <20131210095019.GB32555@debian> <0a9401cef5eb$7e32a110$7a97e330$@acm.org> <20131211010337.GB4894@agk-dp.fab.redhat.com> <0aea01cef615$d688f8d0$839aea70$@acm.org> Reply-To: device-mapper development Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <0aea01cef615$d688f8d0$839aea70$@acm.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com To: "Paul B. Henson" Cc: 'device-mapper development' , 'Alasdair G Kergon' List-Id: dm-devel.ids On Tue, Dec 10 2013 at 9:08pm -0500, Paul B. Henson wrote: > > From: Alasdair G Kergon [mailto:agk@redhat.com] > > Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2013 5:04 PM > > > > We send them to mainline and stable then it is up to the distributions > > concerned to choose to apply them. > > I meant more whether they'd get applied to the LTS kernel upstream; eg, show > up in a minor patch to 3.10 from kernel.org. 3.10 is actively maintained by gregkh as a "longterm" stable kernel so all relevant upstream commits should make their way into that tree: http://www.linuxfoundation.org/news-media/blogs/browse/2013/08/longterm-kernel-310