From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754347Ab3LQNlm (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Dec 2013 08:41:42 -0500 Received: from mail-ee0-f48.google.com ([74.125.83.48]:49919 "EHLO mail-ee0-f48.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754311Ab3LQNlk (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Dec 2013 08:41:40 -0500 Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2013 14:41:37 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Cc: Stanislav Fomichev , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, paulus@samba.org, mingo@redhat.com, namhyung@kernel.org, artagnon@gmail.com, jolsa@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5 v2] perf timechart: add emphasize option Message-ID: <20131217134137.GA29396@gmail.com> References: <1385995056-20158-1-git-send-email-stfomichev@yandex-team.ru> <20131216193800.GA19283@ghostprotocols.net> <20131217093855.GA3345@stfomichev-desktop> <20131217112303.GB27791@gmail.com> <20131217121522.GA6357@stfomichev-desktop> <20131217133821.GA6517@ghostprotocols.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20131217133821.GA6517@ghostprotocols.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > Em Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 04:15:22PM +0400, Stanislav Fomichev escreveu: > > > Please give a sample usage command line and a sample output. (the > > > highlighting can be done using ASCII escape sequences in the changelog > > > as well.) > > Highlighting is done in the generated SVG, so I can't really show it in > > the log or documentation. But I added simple example with -e option. > > > > > -e:: > > > --emphasize=:: > > Thanks, added. > > I also wonder how to allocate single letter options here... can we live > with just --emphasize for now? Wouldn't at some point we maybe want to > use -e in 'perf timechart' to pick some specific event, and then, to > make it consistent with the other tools, -e would then be used? I wanted to raise a similar argument too - so if we don't have to do -e then maybe '--grep' would be the better option name? If it becomes popular then the pattern matching can be improved, without having to change the option name and such. Thanks, Ingo