From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753841Ab3LRMaY (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Dec 2013 07:30:24 -0500 Received: from merlin.infradead.org ([205.233.59.134]:45606 "EHLO merlin.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752673Ab3LRMaX (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Dec 2013 07:30:23 -0500 Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 13:30:01 +0100 From: Peter Zijlstra To: Frederic Weisbecker Cc: LKML , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Steven Rostedt , "Paul E. McKenney" , John Stultz , Alex Shi , Kevin Hilman Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/13] nohz: Hand over timekeeping duty on cpu offlining Message-ID: <20131218123001.GT13532@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <1387320692-28460-1-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com> <1387320692-28460-11-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1387320692-28460-11-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2012-12-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 11:51:29PM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > The default timekeeper (aka CPU 0) is the perfect candidate for this > task since it can't be offlined itself. Like said previously, yes it can!