From: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] usb: gadget: fotg210: EP0 fifo empty indication is non-reliable
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 15:55:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201312181555.47125.marex@denx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1387351489-2008-3-git-send-email-dantesu@gmail.com>
On Wednesday, December 18, 2013 at 08:24:49 AM, Kuo-Jung Su wrote:
> From: Kuo-Jung Su <dantesu@faraday-tech.com>
>
> Because the EP0 fifo empty indication is non-reliable,
> an extra delay is necessary to avoid data corruption while
> handling packets with size greater than 64 bytes.
>
> This workaround should be applied to all hardware revisions.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kuo-Jung Su <dantesu@faraday-tech.com>
> CC: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
> ---
> drivers/usb/gadget/fotg210.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/fotg210.c b/drivers/usb/gadget/fotg210.c
> index e3a61cc..14bfec6 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/gadget/fotg210.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/fotg210.c
> @@ -245,6 +245,7 @@ static int fotg210_dma(struct fotg210_ep *ep, struct
> fotg210_request *req) if (ep->id == 0) {
> /* Wait until cx/ep0 fifo empty */
> fotg210_cxwait(chip, CXFIFO_CXFIFOE);
> + udelay_masked(1);
Why don't you use regular udelay() here please ? Also, how exactly does the
delay help solving the unreliability problem please?
> writel(DMAFIFO_CX, ®s->dma_fifo);
> } else {
> /* Wait until epx fifo empty */
Best regards,
Marek Vasut
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-12-18 14:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-12-18 7:24 [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/2] usb: gadget: fotg210: workaround & new hardware support Kuo-Jung Su
2013-12-18 7:24 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] usb: gadget: fotg210: add w1c interrupt status support Kuo-Jung Su
2013-12-18 14:54 ` Marek Vasut
2013-12-19 0:54 ` Kuo-Jung Su
2013-12-19 1:53 ` Marek Vasut
2013-12-19 7:10 ` Kuo-Jung Su
2013-12-19 7:17 ` Marek Vasut
2013-12-18 7:24 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] usb: gadget: fotg210: EP0 fifo empty indication is non-reliable Kuo-Jung Su
2013-12-18 14:55 ` Marek Vasut [this message]
2013-12-19 0:50 ` Kuo-Jung Su
2013-12-19 1:54 ` Marek Vasut
2013-12-19 7:07 ` Kuo-Jung Su
2013-12-19 7:17 ` Marek Vasut
2013-12-20 3:45 ` Kuo-Jung Su
2013-12-20 8:17 ` Marek Vasut
2013-12-20 4:32 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 0/2] usb: gadget: fotg210: workaround & new hardware support Kuo-Jung Su
2013-12-20 4:32 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 1/2] usb: gadget: fotg210: add w1c interrupt status support Kuo-Jung Su
2013-12-20 4:33 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 2/2] usb: gadget: fotg210: EP0 fifo empty indication is non-reliable Kuo-Jung Su
2013-12-20 11:22 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 0/2] usb: gadget: fotg210: workaround & new hardware support Marek Vasut
2013-12-23 0:50 ` Kuo-Jung Su
2013-12-23 0:55 ` Marek Vasut
2013-12-24 8:14 ` Kuo-Jung Su
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201312181555.47125.marex@denx.de \
--to=marex@denx.de \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.