Re: [PATCH 01/18] perf sort: Compare addresses if no symbol info

[Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>]

Em Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 02:35:28PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> Em Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 04:38:49PM +0100, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> > > +static int64_t _sort__addr_cmp(u64 left_ip, u64 right_ip)
> > > +{
> > > +	return (int64_t)(right_ip - left_ip);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > 
> > what's the reason for the leading '_' in the name?
> 
> Yeah, I'm curious as well, the convention is to only use double _ in
> front of functions when it does a little less than a function of the
> same name without such prefix, like locking, etc.
> 
> - Arnaldo
>  
> > otherwise:
> > 
> > Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>

Yeah, I'll apply it, it just keeps whatever convention that is there
already. I'll take a stab at fixing it all up after merging this
--whatever-the-cumulate-option-becomes new code :-)

- Arnaldo