Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] ppc-e500: implement PCI INTx routing

["Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>]

On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 10:53:32PM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
> 
> On 28.11.2013, at 07:35, Bharat Bhushan <r65777@freescale.com> wrote:
> 
> > This patch adds pci pin to irq_num routing callback
> > Without this patch we gets below warning
> > 
> > "
> >  PCI: Bug - unimplemented PCI INTx routing (e500-pcihost)
> >  qemu-system-ppc64: PCI: Bug - unimplemented PCI INTx routing (e500-pcihost)
> > "
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Bharat Bhushan <Bharat.Bhushan@freescale.com>
> > ---
> > hw/pci-host/ppce500.c |   20 ++++++++++++++++++--
> > 1 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/hw/pci-host/ppce500.c b/hw/pci-host/ppce500.c
> > index 49bfcc6..3c4cf9e 100644
> > --- a/hw/pci-host/ppce500.c
> > +++ b/hw/pci-host/ppce500.c
> > @@ -88,6 +88,7 @@ struct PPCE500PCIState {
> >     struct pci_inbound pib[PPCE500_PCI_NR_PIBS];
> >     uint32_t gasket_time;
> >     qemu_irq irq[PCI_NUM_PINS];
> > +    uint32_t irq_num[PCI_NUM_PINS];
> >     uint32_t first_slot;
> >     /* mmio maps */
> >     MemoryRegion container;
> > @@ -267,13 +268,26 @@ static int mpc85xx_pci_map_irq(PCIDevice *pci_dev, int pin)
> > 
> > static void mpc85xx_pci_set_irq(void *opaque, int pin, int level)
> > {
> > -    qemu_irq *pic = opaque;
> > +    PPCE500PCIState *s = opaque;
> > +    qemu_irq *pic = s->irq;;
> 
> Double semicolon?
> 
> > 
> >     pci_debug("%s: PCI irq %d, level:%d\n", __func__, pin , level);
> > 
> >     qemu_set_irq(pic[pin], level);
> > }
> > 
> > +static PCIINTxRoute e500_route_intx_pin_to_irq(void *opaque, int pin)
> > +{
> > +    PCIINTxRoute route;
> > +    PPCE500PCIState *s = opaque;
> > +
> > +    route.mode = PCI_INTX_ENABLED;
> > +    route.irq = s->irq_num[pin];
> > +
> > +    pci_debug("%s: PCI irq-pin = %d, irq_num= %d\n", __func__, pin, route.irq);
> > +    return route;
> > +}
> > +
> > static const VMStateDescription vmstate_pci_outbound = {
> >     .name = "pci_outbound",
> >     .version_id = 0,
> > @@ -350,12 +364,13 @@ static int e500_pcihost_initfn(SysBusDevice *dev)
> > 
> >     for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(s->irq); i++) {
> >         sysbus_init_irq(dev, &s->irq[i]);
> > +        s->irq_num[i] = i + 1;
> 
> Doesn't this duplicate the logic from ppce500_pci_map_irq_slot()? I don't understand the purpose of this whole exercise to be honest.
> 
> Michael, could you please shed some light on this?
> 
> 
> Alex

This is printed by pci_device_route_intx_to_irq - it's used by device
assignment and vfio to figure out which irq does a
given pci device drive.

> >     }
> > 
> >     memory_region_init(&s->pio, OBJECT(s), "pci-pio", PCIE500_PCI_IOLEN);
> > 
> >     b = pci_register_bus(DEVICE(dev), NULL, mpc85xx_pci_set_irq,
> > -                         mpc85xx_pci_map_irq, s->irq, address_space_mem,
> > +                         mpc85xx_pci_map_irq, s, address_space_mem,
> >                          &s->pio, PCI_DEVFN(s->first_slot, 0), 4, TYPE_PCI_BUS);
> >     h->bus = b;
> > 
> > @@ -373,6 +388,7 @@ static int e500_pcihost_initfn(SysBusDevice *dev)
> >     memory_region_add_subregion(&s->container, PCIE500_REG_BASE, &s->iomem);
> >     sysbus_init_mmio(dev, &s->container);
> >     sysbus_init_mmio(dev, &s->pio);
> > +    pci_bus_set_route_irq_fn(b, e500_route_intx_pin_to_irq);
> > 
> >     return 0;
> > }
> > -- 
> > 1.7.0.4
> > 
> >