From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Simon Horman Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 06:40:52 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] sh-pfc: Fix GPIO to IRQ mapping Message-Id: <20131219064052.GE10230@verge.net.au> List-Id: References: <1386732390-31724-1-git-send-email-laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com> <20131212131139.GE30624@verge.net.au> <20131213001456.GB32101@verge.net.au> In-Reply-To: <20131213001456.GB32101@verge.net.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 09:14:56AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote: > On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 10:05:55PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 2:11 PM, Simon Horman wrote: > > > > > It seems to me that if Linus applies the pfc changes the > > > shmobile changes could be applied independently. Am I missing > > > and do the shmobile patches have build-dependencies on the pfc patches? > > > > I've applied the PFC changes to the pin control tree and will push > > to kernelorg shortly, then allow it to stablilze before you attempt to > > pull that into the SH mobile tree please, and notify me before > > doing so and make sure to just pick the top commit you need. > > Thanks, I understand. > > I'll re-visit this next week. Hi Linus, just to let you know I am planning to use 70c8f01a357ac74d ("sh-pfc: Support GPIO to IRQ mapping specified IRQ resources") From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: horms@verge.net.au (Simon Horman) Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 15:40:52 +0900 Subject: [PATCH 00/10] sh-pfc: Fix GPIO to IRQ mapping In-Reply-To: <20131213001456.GB32101@verge.net.au> References: <1386732390-31724-1-git-send-email-laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com> <20131212131139.GE30624@verge.net.au> <20131213001456.GB32101@verge.net.au> Message-ID: <20131219064052.GE10230@verge.net.au> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 09:14:56AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote: > On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 10:05:55PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 2:11 PM, Simon Horman wrote: > > > > > It seems to me that if Linus applies the pfc changes the > > > shmobile changes could be applied independently. Am I missing > > > and do the shmobile patches have build-dependencies on the pfc patches? > > > > I've applied the PFC changes to the pin control tree and will push > > to kernelorg shortly, then allow it to stablilze before you attempt to > > pull that into the SH mobile tree please, and notify me before > > doing so and make sure to just pick the top commit you need. > > Thanks, I understand. > > I'll re-visit this next week. Hi Linus, just to let you know I am planning to use 70c8f01a357ac74d ("sh-pfc: Support GPIO to IRQ mapping specified IRQ resources")