All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@lge.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>,
	David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] perf report: Use pr_*() functions if possible
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 10:30:47 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131219133047.GK4819@ghostprotocols.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1387436411-20160-2-git-send-email-namhyung@kernel.org>

Em Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 04:00:06PM +0900, Namhyung Kim escreveu:
> From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@lge.com>
> 
> There're some places printing a message to stdout/err directly.  It
> should be converted to use proper error printing functions instead.
> 
> If it's not possible, just do it when --stdio was enabled only.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
> ---
>  tools/perf/builtin-report.c | 24 +++++++++++++-----------
>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-report.c b/tools/perf/builtin-report.c
> index 3a14dbed387c..a1f72b471a96 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/builtin-report.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-report.c
> @@ -321,8 +321,8 @@ static int process_sample_event(struct perf_tool *tool,
>  	int ret;
>  
>  	if (perf_event__preprocess_sample(event, machine, &al, sample) < 0) {
> -		fprintf(stderr, "problem processing %d event, skipping it.\n",
> -			event->header.type);
> +		pr_debug("problem processing %d event, skipping it.\n",
> +			 event->header.type);
>  		return -1;
>  	}
>  
> @@ -552,15 +552,17 @@ static int __cmd_report(struct perf_report *rep)
>  		desc);
>  	}
>  
> -	if (verbose > 3)
> -		perf_session__fprintf(session, stdout);
> +	if (use_browser == 0) {
> +		if (verbose > 3)
> +			perf_session__fprintf(session, stdout);
>  
> -	if (verbose > 2)
> -		perf_session__fprintf_dsos(session, stdout);
> +		if (verbose > 2)
> +			perf_session__fprintf_dsos(session, stdout);
>  
> -	if (dump_trace) {
> -		perf_session__fprintf_nr_events(session, stdout);
> -		return 0;
> +		if (dump_trace) {
> +			perf_session__fprintf_nr_events(session, stdout);
> +			return 0;
> +		}
>  	}

This should be in a different patch, one that is related just to
dump_trace, i.e. if -D, aka dump_trace (right?) is enabled, then
probably we won't be initializing the TUI/GUI, no?

So having a patch that deals just with conversions of fprintf ->
pr_{err,etc} and another that deals with dump_trace related seems to be
the best course of action.

- Arnaldo
  
>  	nr_samples = 0;
> @@ -720,7 +722,7 @@ parse_callchain_opt(const struct option *opt, const char *arg, int unset)
>  		return -1;
>  setup:
>  	if (callchain_register_param(&callchain_param) < 0) {
> -		fprintf(stderr, "Can't register callchain params\n");
> +		pr_err("Can't register callchain params\n");
>  		return -1;
>  	}
>  	return 0;
> @@ -942,7 +944,7 @@ repeat:
>  	}
>  	if (report.mem_mode) {
>  		if (sort__mode == SORT_MODE__BRANCH) {
> -			fprintf(stderr, "branch and mem mode incompatible\n");
> +			pr_err("branch and mem mode incompatible\n");
>  			goto error;
>  		}
>  		sort__mode = SORT_MODE__MEMORY;
> -- 
> 1.7.11.7

  reply	other threads:[~2013-12-19 13:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-12-19  7:00 [PATCHSET 0/6] perf tools: A couple of TUI improvements Namhyung Kim
2013-12-19  7:00 ` [PATCH 1/6] perf report: Use pr_*() functions if possible Namhyung Kim
2013-12-19 13:30   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2013-12-20  1:32     ` Namhyung Kim
2013-12-19 13:31   ` Jiri Olsa
2013-12-20  1:36     ` Namhyung Kim
2013-12-19  7:00 ` [PATCH 2/6] perf tools: Introduce struct perf_log Namhyung Kim
2013-12-19 13:28   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2013-12-20  1:28     ` Namhyung Kim
2013-12-19  7:00 ` [PATCH 3/6] perf tools: Get rid of a duplicate va_end() Namhyung Kim
2013-12-19 13:32   ` Jiri Olsa
2013-12-19 13:32   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2014-01-12 18:32   ` [tip:perf/core] perf tools: Get rid of a duplicate va_end() in error reporting routine tip-bot for Namhyung Kim
2013-12-19  7:00 ` [PATCH 4/6] perf tools: Save message when pr_*() was called Namhyung Kim
2013-12-19  7:00 ` [PATCH 5/6] perf ui/tui: Implement log window Namhyung Kim
2013-12-19  7:00 ` [PATCH 6/6] perf ui/tui: Implement header window Namhyung Kim
2013-12-19 12:14 ` [PATCHSET 0/6] perf tools: A couple of TUI improvements Ingo Molnar
2013-12-20  1:20   ` Namhyung Kim
2013-12-19 13:39 ` Jiri Olsa
2013-12-19 15:51   ` Ingo Molnar
2013-12-19 15:53   ` Ingo Molnar
2013-12-20  1:21     ` Namhyung Kim

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20131219133047.GK4819@ghostprotocols.net \
    --to=acme@ghostprotocols.net \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=dsahern@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=namhyung.kim@lge.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.