From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754298Ab3LSPqr (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Dec 2013 10:46:47 -0500 Received: from mail-ea0-f179.google.com ([209.85.215.179]:55053 "EHLO mail-ea0-f179.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752038Ab3LSPqq (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Dec 2013 10:46:46 -0500 Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 16:46:42 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: David Chen Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , lkml , Ingo Molnar , Jiri Olsa Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf config: ignore generated files in feature-checks Message-ID: <20131219154642.GA24658@gmail.com> References: <1387441761-2153-1-git-send-email-tuxoko@gmail.com> <20131219115833.GA11279@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * David Chen wrote: > Why not? They're generated files aren't they? Yes, indeed, you are right, they should be included in the .gitignore. > By the way, I just found out that test-* will be built depend on the > detected features. > Should I include them all? Yes, that would have been my next observation :-) I'd suggest that instead of enumerating them all in the .gitignore file we should change the naming of the feature check binaries to something like test-.bin or so, so that a simple test-*.bin pattern will ignore all these generated binaries. Thanks, Ingo