From: Timo Teras <timo.teras@iki.fi>
To: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] fs/binfmt_elf: fix memory map for PIE applications
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 17:26:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131219172644.7bb5f332@vostro> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1312191558140.11852@pobox.suse.cz>
On Thu, 19 Dec 2013 16:02:19 +0100 (CET)
Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Dec 2013, Timo Teras wrote:
>
> > As you see, the main executable is mapped 57620000-57708000 and
> > 57708000-5770a000. Heap follow immediately after that
> > 5770a000-5770c000 followed by anything mmaped after it (stack or
> > some other libraries). Heap can grow only up to 5ffdf000 meaning the
> > application is limited to 140 megs or so in this instance. This
> > limit can go much lower depending how the randomization went. And
> > even 140 megs is very little for big apps.
>
> So what is the real problem again (i.e. the actual symptoms), please?
> Is it that your userspace memory allocator doesn't use mmap() for
> allocations at all?
Random application failures with uclibc and musl c-libraries. Both seem
to use mmap() for large allocations, and brk() for small ones. IIRC,
there was also some minor breakage with other applications that use
brk() to do some self-accounting / other funny stuff.
While this is not strictly a bug, I would still hope that the memory
layout is configured for maximum compatibility... or do you see it
introducing unwanted side effects?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-12-19 15:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-02 7:19 [PATCH RFC] fs/binfmt_elf: fix memory map for PIE applications Timo Teräs
2013-10-02 7:19 ` Timo Teräs
2013-12-19 14:17 ` Jiri Kosina
2013-12-19 14:42 ` Timo Teras
2013-12-19 15:02 ` Jiri Kosina
2013-12-19 15:26 ` Timo Teras [this message]
2013-12-19 15:33 ` Jiri Kosina
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-03-08 22:44 David Heidelberger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131219172644.7bb5f332@vostro \
--to=timo.teras@iki.fi \
--cc=jkosina@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.