Re: [PATCH v4] x86: sysfb: remove sysfb when probing real hw

[Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>]

* David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@gmail.com> wrote:

> +/*
> + * Unregister the sysfb and prevent new sysfbs from getting registered. Can be
> + * called from any context except recursively or from sysfb_register().
> + * Used by remove_conflicting_framebuffers() and friends.
> + */
> +void sysfb_unregister(const struct apertures_struct *apert, bool primary)
> +{
> +	mutex_lock(&sysfb_lock);
> +	if (!IS_ERR(sysfb_dev) && sysfb_dev) {
> +		if (sysfb_match(apert, primary)) {
> +			platform_device_unregister(sysfb_dev);
> +			sysfb_dev = ERR_PTR(-EALREADY);
> +		}
> +	} else {
> +		/* if !sysfb_dev, set err so no new sysfb is probed later */
> +		sysfb_dev = ERR_PTR(-EALREADY);

Just a small detail: we can get into this 'else' branch not just with 
NULL, but also with IS_ERR(sysfb_dev). In that case we override 
whatever error code is contained in sysfb_dev and overwrite it with 
ERR_PTR(-EALREADY).

(Probably not a big deal, because we don't actually ever seem to 
extract the error code from the pointer, but wanted to mention it.)

> +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_SYSFB
> +#include <asm/sysfb.h>
> +#endif

Pet peeve, this looks sexier:

#ifdef CONFIG_X86_SYSFB
# include <asm/sysfb.h>
#endif

> @@ -1604,6 +1607,17 @@ static void do_remove_conflicting_framebuffers(struct apertures_struct *a,
>  	}
>  }
>  
> +static void remove_conflicting_sysfb(const struct apertures_struct *apert,
> +				     bool primary)
> +{
> +	if (!apert)
> +		return;
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_SYSFB
> +	sysfb_unregister(apert, primary);
> +#endif
> +}

So why not make sysfb_unregister() accept a !apert parameter (it would 
simply return), at which point remove_conflicting_sysfb() could be 
eliminated and just be replaced with a direct sysfb_unregister() call 
- with no #ifdefs.

We only need #ifdefs for the sysfb_unregister() declaration in the .h 
file.

At first sight this looks simpler and cleaner for the fix itself - no 
need for extra cleanups for this detail.

Thanks,

	Ingo