From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: dietmar.eggemann@arm.com
Cc: mingo@redhat.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org,
morten.rasmussen@arm.com, chris.redpath@arm.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 5/8] sched: introduce common topology level init function
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2013 15:04:51 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131220140451.GV16438@laptop.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1386936688-29113-6-git-send-email-dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
> +/*
> + * SD_flags allowed in topology descriptions.
> + *
> + * SD_SHARE_CPUPOWER - describes SMT topologies
> + * SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCES - describes shared caches
> + * SD_NUMA - describes NUMA topologies
> + *
> + * Odd one out:
> + * SD_ASYM_PACKING - describes SMT quirks
> + *
> + * SD_PREFER_SIBLING - describes preference for sibling domain
> + */
> +#define TOPOLOGY_SD_FLAGS \
> + (SD_SHARE_CPUPOWER | \
> + SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCES | \
> + SD_NUMA | \
> + SD_ASYM_PACKING | \
> + SD_PREFER_SIBLING)
See SD_PREFER_SIBLING is behavioural, the exact kinda thing we want to
keep out of this mask,
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-12-20 14:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-12-13 12:11 [RFC PATCH 0/8] change scheduler domain hierarchy set-up dietmar.eggemann
2013-12-13 12:11 ` [RFC PATCH 1/8] sched: arch interface for scheduler domain setup dietmar.eggemann
2013-12-13 12:11 ` [RFC PATCH 2/8] arm: implement " dietmar.eggemann
2013-12-13 12:11 ` [RFC PATCH 3/8] x86: " dietmar.eggemann
2013-12-13 12:11 ` [RFC PATCH 4/8] sched: allocate the entire topology array dynamically dietmar.eggemann
2013-12-13 12:11 ` [RFC PATCH 5/8] sched: introduce common topology level init function dietmar.eggemann
2013-12-20 14:04 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2014-01-06 18:41 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2013-12-13 12:11 ` [RFC PATCH 6/8] sched: replace for_each_sd_topology with explicit for loop dietmar.eggemann
2013-12-13 12:11 ` [RFC PATCH 7/8] sched: replace topology level init func ptr with sd_init dietmar.eggemann
2013-12-13 12:11 ` [RFC PATCH 8/8] sched: remove scheduler domain naming dietmar.eggemann
2013-12-20 14:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-06 18:41 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2014-01-07 10:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-07 14:33 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2013-12-20 14:00 ` [RFC PATCH 0/8] change scheduler domain hierarchy set-up Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-06 18:40 ` Dietmar Eggemann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131220140451.GV16438@laptop.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=chris.redpath@arm.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.