From: u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de (Uwe Kleine-König)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [GIT PULL] get rid of <mach/timex.h>
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2013 19:47:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131220184715.GT14866@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131219221758.GS14866@pengutronix.de>
Hello again,
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 11:17:58PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-K?nig wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 07:20:42AM -0800, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> > Looks like there are still several users of LATCH, which references CLOCK_TICK_RATE
> > and is causing failures on lots of defconfigs.
> darn, I missed these because my compile testing was done without
> removing the dummy value of CLOCK_TICK_RATE in <asm/timex.h> and I then
> relied on the 0day bot who obviously didn't build the critical configs.
> :-\
>
> The problems are fixed by:
> - "ARM: rpc: stop using <mach/timex.h>" which I just sent in this
> thread.
> - "ARM: u300: fix timekeeping when periodic mode is used", a patch I
> sent earlier and that Linus W. wanted to merge. It's not yet in
> -next. Maybe I can take it instead into this series? Linus?
> - The patch pasted below distributed on the respective commits.
> Apart from the netx patch these don't have any affected acks. Sascha,
> I assume I can keep your Ack?
>
> I'll update my tree when I have feedback by Linus and Sascha.
I just did that. I squashed the changes into the respective commits,
rebased on Linus W.'s latest pull request and added the rpc change. Now
all defconfigs build.
Please pull
git://git.pengutronix.de/git/ukl/linux.git tags/dropmachtimexh
which points to 79f08d9ed217318b4f325b7fcf8f26dcd0e41689 now provided
you are happy with Linus W.'s series, too.
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-K?nig |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-12-20 18:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-12-13 22:16 [GIT PULL] get rid of <mach/timex.h> Uwe Kleine-König
2013-12-17 13:28 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2013-12-19 15:20 ` Kevin Hilman
2013-12-19 21:57 ` [PATCH] ARM: rpc: stop using <mach/timex.h> Uwe Kleine-König
2013-12-19 22:17 ` [GIT PULL] get rid of <mach/timex.h> Uwe Kleine-König
2013-12-20 8:35 ` Linus Walleij
2013-12-20 13:20 ` Sascha Hauer
2013-12-20 18:47 ` Uwe Kleine-König [this message]
2014-01-07 11:24 ` Nicolas Ferre
2014-01-13 13:36 ` Linus Walleij
2014-01-13 18:26 ` Olof Johansson
2014-01-13 19:42 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2014-02-03 10:31 ` [PATCH] [RFC] ARM: ixp4xx: fix timer latch calculation Uwe Kleine-König
2014-02-17 7:43 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2014-01-14 10:25 ` [GIT PULL] get rid of <mach/timex.h> Linus Walleij
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131220184715.GT14866@pengutronix.de \
--to=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.