From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Steffen Klassert Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 net-next] xfrm: Namespacify xfrm_policy_sk_bundles Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2013 10:50:07 +0100 Message-ID: <20131224095007.GA29716@secunet.com> References: <1387424650.19078.355.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com> <52B3BAD1.30205@windriver.com> <52B8DF80.2010508@windriver.com> <20131224.003125.1848179270970861998.davem@davemloft.net> <52B91E21.1050907@windriver.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: David Miller , eric.dumazet@gmail.com, xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Fan Du Return-path: Received: from a.mx.secunet.com ([195.81.216.161]:51841 "EHLO a.mx.secunet.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751486Ab3LXJuK (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Dec 2013 04:50:10 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <52B91E21.1050907@windriver.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 01:39:45PM +0800, Fan Du wrote: >=20 >=20 > On 2013=E5=B9=B412=E6=9C=8824=E6=97=A5 13:31, David Miller wrote: > >From: Fan Du > >Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2013 09:12:32 +0800 > > > >>> I saw this patch is marked 'Not Applicable' in patchwork. > >It means that it doesn't go in via my tree directly, it > >"doesn't apply". > > > >Instead, it goes into Steffen's IPSEC tree. > > Yes, I'll take care about this one. I'm currently traveling, so I have not that much time for review and tests of patches. I'll integrate all pending ipsec patches after the holidays. >=20 > Thanks for your explanation!!! >=20 > I'm not well understand the curtsy about patchwork, and one last ques= tion, > [PATCHv4 net-next 0/8] pktgen IPsec support is tagged as 'Awaiting Up= stream' > what does that mean and do I need to take further action about this p= atch set? >=20 I guess that means the same, it goes into the ipsec-next tree :)