From: Zheng Liu <gnehzuil.liu@gmail.com>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>,
Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>,
Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@taobao.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] ext4: improve extents status tree trace point
Date: Wed, 25 Dec 2013 11:23:20 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131225032320.GB23505@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131223083903.GA9199@quack.suse.cz>
On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 09:39:03AM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Fri 20-12-13 18:42:44, Zheng Liu wrote:
> > From: Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@taobao.com>
> >
> > This commit improves the trace point of extents status tree. For
> > improving the shrinker, we need to collect more details from trace
> > point. First we put more enter/exit pairs in insertion, deletion,
> > and caching code path in order to collect the latency of these code
> > path. Then we rename trace_ext4_es_shrink_enter in ext4_es_count()
> > because it is also used in ext4_es_scan() and we don't identify
> > them from the result.
> Umm, I think you can use a generic 'function trace' infrastructure to
> trace entry & exit into arbitrary functions in kernel. So there shouldn't
> be a need to introduce extra entry & exit tracepoints.
Ah, thanks for reminding me. Yes, 'function trace' is extreme useful!
- Zheng
>
> Honza
>
> > Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
> > Cc: Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>
> > Signed-off-by: Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@taobao.com>
> > ---
> > fs/ext4/extents_status.c | 15 ++++++++------
> > include/trace/events/ext4.h | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> > 2 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/ext4/extents_status.c b/fs/ext4/extents_status.c
> > index 3981ff7..e842d74 100644
> > --- a/fs/ext4/extents_status.c
> > +++ b/fs/ext4/extents_status.c
> > @@ -660,7 +660,7 @@ int ext4_es_insert_extent(struct inode *inode, ext4_lblk_t lblk,
> > newes.es_len = len;
> > ext4_es_store_pblock(&newes, pblk);
> > ext4_es_store_status(&newes, status);
> > - trace_ext4_es_insert_extent(inode, &newes);
> > + trace_ext4_es_insert_extent_enter(inode, &newes);
> >
> > ext4_es_insert_extent_check(inode, &newes);
> >
> > @@ -678,6 +678,7 @@ retry:
> >
> > error:
> > write_unlock(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_es_lock);
> > + trace_ext4_es_insert_extent_exit(inode, &newes);
> >
> > ext4_es_print_tree(inode);
> >
> > @@ -701,7 +702,7 @@ void ext4_es_cache_extent(struct inode *inode, ext4_lblk_t lblk,
> > newes.es_len = len;
> > ext4_es_store_pblock(&newes, pblk);
> > ext4_es_store_status(&newes, status);
> > - trace_ext4_es_cache_extent(inode, &newes);
> > + trace_ext4_es_cache_extent_enter(inode, &newes);
> >
> > if (!len)
> > return;
> > @@ -714,6 +715,7 @@ void ext4_es_cache_extent(struct inode *inode, ext4_lblk_t lblk,
> > if (!es || es->es_lblk > end)
> > __es_insert_extent(inode, &newes);
> > write_unlock(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_es_lock);
> > + trace_ext4_es_cache_extent_exit(inode, &newes);
> > }
> >
> > /*
> > @@ -887,7 +889,7 @@ int ext4_es_remove_extent(struct inode *inode, ext4_lblk_t lblk,
> > ext4_lblk_t end;
> > int err = 0;
> >
> > - trace_ext4_es_remove_extent(inode, lblk, len);
> > + trace_ext4_es_remove_extent_enter(inode, lblk, len);
> > es_debug("remove [%u/%u) from extent status tree of inode %lu\n",
> > lblk, len, inode->i_ino);
> >
> > @@ -901,6 +903,7 @@ int ext4_es_remove_extent(struct inode *inode, ext4_lblk_t lblk,
> > err = __es_remove_extent(inode, lblk, end);
> > write_unlock(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_es_lock);
> > ext4_es_print_tree(inode);
> > + trace_ext4_es_remove_extent_exit(inode, lblk, len);
> > return err;
> > }
> >
> > @@ -1017,7 +1020,7 @@ static unsigned long ext4_es_count(struct shrinker *shrink,
> >
> > sbi = container_of(shrink, struct ext4_sb_info, s_es_shrinker);
> > nr = percpu_counter_read_positive(&sbi->s_extent_cache_cnt);
> > - trace_ext4_es_shrink_enter(sbi->s_sb, sc->nr_to_scan, nr);
> > + trace_ext4_es_shrink_count(sbi->s_sb, sc->nr_to_scan, nr);
> > return nr;
> > }
> >
> > @@ -1030,14 +1033,14 @@ static unsigned long ext4_es_scan(struct shrinker *shrink,
> > int ret, nr_shrunk;
> >
> > ret = percpu_counter_read_positive(&sbi->s_extent_cache_cnt);
> > - trace_ext4_es_shrink_enter(sbi->s_sb, nr_to_scan, ret);
> > + trace_ext4_es_shrink_scan_enter(sbi->s_sb, nr_to_scan, ret);
> >
> > if (!nr_to_scan)
> > return ret;
> >
> > nr_shrunk = __ext4_es_shrink(sbi, nr_to_scan, NULL);
> >
> > - trace_ext4_es_shrink_exit(sbi->s_sb, nr_shrunk, ret);
> > + trace_ext4_es_shrink_scan_exit(sbi->s_sb, nr_shrunk, ret);
> > return nr_shrunk;
> > }
> >
> > diff --git a/include/trace/events/ext4.h b/include/trace/events/ext4.h
> > index 197d312..8b3ff82 100644
> > --- a/include/trace/events/ext4.h
> > +++ b/include/trace/events/ext4.h
> > @@ -2221,19 +2221,31 @@ DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(ext4__es_extent,
> > __entry->pblk, show_extent_status(__entry->status))
> > );
> >
> > -DEFINE_EVENT(ext4__es_extent, ext4_es_insert_extent,
> > +DEFINE_EVENT(ext4__es_extent, ext4_es_insert_extent_enter,
> > TP_PROTO(struct inode *inode, struct extent_status *es),
> >
> > TP_ARGS(inode, es)
> > );
> >
> > -DEFINE_EVENT(ext4__es_extent, ext4_es_cache_extent,
> > +DEFINE_EVENT(ext4__es_extent, ext4_es_insert_extent_exit,
> > TP_PROTO(struct inode *inode, struct extent_status *es),
> >
> > TP_ARGS(inode, es)
> > );
> >
> > -TRACE_EVENT(ext4_es_remove_extent,
> > +DEFINE_EVENT(ext4__es_extent, ext4_es_cache_extent_enter,
> > + TP_PROTO(struct inode *inode, struct extent_status *es),
> > +
> > + TP_ARGS(inode, es)
> > +);
> > +
> > +DEFINE_EVENT(ext4__es_extent, ext4_es_cache_extent_exit,
> > + TP_PROTO(struct inode *inode, struct extent_status *es),
> > +
> > + TP_ARGS(inode, es)
> > +);
> > +
> > +DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(ext4__es_remove_extent,
> > TP_PROTO(struct inode *inode, ext4_lblk_t lblk, ext4_lblk_t len),
> >
> > TP_ARGS(inode, lblk, len),
> > @@ -2258,6 +2270,18 @@ TRACE_EVENT(ext4_es_remove_extent,
> > __entry->lblk, __entry->len)
> > );
> >
> > +DEFINE_EVENT(ext4__es_remove_extent, ext4_es_remove_extent_enter,
> > + TP_PROTO(struct inode *inode, ext4_lblk_t lblk, ext4_lblk_t len),
> > +
> > + TP_ARGS(inode, lblk, len)
> > +);
> > +
> > +DEFINE_EVENT(ext4__es_remove_extent, ext4_es_remove_extent_exit,
> > + TP_PROTO(struct inode *inode, ext4_lblk_t lblk, ext4_lblk_t len),
> > +
> > + TP_ARGS(inode, lblk, len)
> > +);
> > +
> > TRACE_EVENT(ext4_es_find_delayed_extent_range_enter,
> > TP_PROTO(struct inode *inode, ext4_lblk_t lblk),
> >
> > @@ -2366,7 +2390,7 @@ TRACE_EVENT(ext4_es_lookup_extent_exit,
> > show_extent_status(__entry->found ? __entry->status : 0))
> > );
> >
> > -TRACE_EVENT(ext4_es_shrink_enter,
> > +DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(ext4__es_shrink_enter,
> > TP_PROTO(struct super_block *sb, int nr_to_scan, int cache_cnt),
> >
> > TP_ARGS(sb, nr_to_scan, cache_cnt),
> > @@ -2388,7 +2412,19 @@ TRACE_EVENT(ext4_es_shrink_enter,
> > __entry->nr_to_scan, __entry->cache_cnt)
> > );
> >
> > -TRACE_EVENT(ext4_es_shrink_exit,
> > +DEFINE_EVENT(ext4__es_shrink_enter, ext4_es_shrink_count,
> > + TP_PROTO(struct super_block *sb, int nr_to_scan, int cache_cnt),
> > +
> > + TP_ARGS(sb, nr_to_scan, cache_cnt)
> > +);
> > +
> > +DEFINE_EVENT(ext4__es_shrink_enter, ext4_es_shrink_scan_enter,
> > + TP_PROTO(struct super_block *sb, int nr_to_scan, int cache_cnt),
> > +
> > + TP_ARGS(sb, nr_to_scan, cache_cnt)
> > +);
> > +
> > +TRACE_EVENT(ext4_es_shrink_scan_exit,
> > TP_PROTO(struct super_block *sb, int shrunk_nr, int cache_cnt),
> >
> > TP_ARGS(sb, shrunk_nr, cache_cnt),
> > --
> > 1.7.9.7
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> --
> Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
> SUSE Labs, CR
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-12-25 3:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-12-20 10:42 [RFC PATCH 0/2] ext4: extents status tree shrinker improvement Zheng Liu
2013-12-20 10:42 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] ext4: improve extents status tree trace point Zheng Liu
2013-12-23 8:39 ` Jan Kara
2013-12-25 3:23 ` Zheng Liu [this message]
2013-12-20 10:42 ` [RFC PATCH 2/2] ext4: improve extents status tree shrinker to avoid scanning delayed entries Zheng Liu
2013-12-23 8:54 ` Jan Kara
2013-12-25 3:34 ` Zheng Liu
2013-12-30 21:09 ` Jan Kara
2013-12-31 2:50 ` Zheng Liu
2013-12-31 8:20 ` [PATCH] ext4: make es shrinker handle nr_to_scan correctly (Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] ext4: improve ...) Zheng Liu
2013-12-31 10:59 ` Jan Kara
2014-01-15 3:02 ` Zheng Liu
2013-12-23 9:03 ` [RFC PATCH 0/2] ext4: extents status tree shrinker improvement Jan Kara
2013-12-25 3:21 ` Zheng Liu
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-01-14 8:06 [RFC PATCH 0/2] add some stats in es shrinker and do some cleanups in tracepoint Zheng Liu
2014-01-14 8:06 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] ext4: improve extents status tree trace point Zheng Liu
2014-01-14 13:14 ` Jan Kara
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131225032320.GB23505@gmail.com \
--to=gnehzuil.liu@gmail.com \
--cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=wenqing.lz@taobao.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.