From: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>
To: Hadar Hen Zion <hadarh@mellanox.com>
Cc: Shawn Bohrer <shawn.bohrer@gmail.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@mellanox.com>,
Amir Vadai <amirv@mellanox.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, tomk@rgmadvisors.com,
Shawn Bohrer <sbohrer@rgmadvisors.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] mlx4_en: Add PTP hardware clock
Date: Wed, 25 Dec 2013 12:49:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131225114934.GA5378@netboy> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52B9AA7B.8090401@mellanox.com>
On Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 05:38:35PM +0200, Hadar Hen Zion wrote:
>
> The spin lock is needed when reading hardware registers.
Or when using a structure of fields that act together as one object.
> My suggestion is to stay with spin locks in all the places
> protecting timecounter_read()/timecounter_init() and just remove the
> spin lock from timecounter_cyc2time()
If you look at the implementation of timecounter_cyc2time, you will
see that locks are, in fact, needed.
See also the comments in clocksource.h.
Thanks,
Richard
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-12-25 11:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-12-17 20:32 [PATCH net-next 0/2] mlx4_en: Add PTP support Shawn Bohrer
2013-12-17 20:32 ` [PATCH net-next 1/2] mlx4_en: Add PTP hardware clock Shawn Bohrer
2013-12-17 21:04 ` Or Gerlitz
2013-12-17 21:46 ` Shawn Bohrer
2013-12-18 7:59 ` Or Gerlitz
2013-12-18 15:03 ` Shawn Bohrer
2013-12-22 13:13 ` Hadar Hen Zion
2013-12-23 16:29 ` Shawn Bohrer
2013-12-23 16:59 ` Shawn Bohrer
2013-12-24 15:38 ` Hadar Hen Zion
2013-12-25 11:49 ` Richard Cochran [this message]
2013-12-23 18:48 ` Richard Cochran
2013-12-24 13:58 ` Hadar Hen Zion
2013-12-25 11:53 ` Richard Cochran
[not found] ` <CAKBbMu33zXkG4+S1kP6zB+4iKMNNoy=XVBtoqZZEkqurRsgvQw@mail.gmail.com>
2013-12-25 17:02 ` Richard Cochran
2013-12-26 8:26 ` Hadar Hen Zion
2013-12-26 8:33 ` Hadar Hen Zion
2013-12-26 9:17 ` Richard Cochran
2013-12-26 14:41 ` Hadar Hen-Zion
2013-12-26 14:49 ` Richard Cochran
2013-12-17 20:32 ` [PATCH net-next 2/2] mlx4_en: Only cycle port if HW timestamp config changes Shawn Bohrer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131225114934.GA5378@netboy \
--to=richardcochran@gmail.com \
--cc=amirv@mellanox.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=hadarh@mellanox.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ogerlitz@mellanox.com \
--cc=sbohrer@rgmadvisors.com \
--cc=shawn.bohrer@gmail.com \
--cc=tomk@rgmadvisors.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.