From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 01/17] ARM: spear: Remove deprecated IRQF_DISABLED flag
Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2014 15:34:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201401031534.37533.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52C5B52E.6080609@linaro.org>
On Thursday 02 January 2014, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 01/02/2014 07:29 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Monday 30 December 2013, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> >> This flag is a NOOP and scheduled to be removed
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
> >
> > Thanks for sending this series. I think the patches are duplicates of stuff that
> > Michael Opdenacker has sent before (actually multiple times). I have no problem
> > applying either version into arm-soc, but I think it would be better to attribute
> > them to Michael, since he came first. Can you two please coordinate and send a
> > single pull request for the arm-soc related patches that haven't made it into
> > linux-next yet?
>
> Michael removed the flag for:
>
> pxa (ed7936f913456e4c01aed75deba6cfaf830fa8cf)
> samsung (fa53d5cdbffbce421c3bd2f937b5626fc044fedc)
> avr32 (7155530d9eb692994d208836e4965da06b17c99d)
> ep93xx (3a71ae4796fdaedbdbdab94660b7b7b5bfe61d1d)
> plat-orion (eb4d552b933ac59c0c8e0604ff435c5208a82679)
>
> The patchset I sent is on top of arm/for-next and finishes to remove
> this flag for arch/arm. It should not overlap with what Michael did.
>
> I'm ok to attribute the patchset to Michael if that can help to accept
> this patchset and kill this flag for arch/arm.
IIRC, Michael actually sent patches for all uses in the entire kernel
previously, but relied on sub-maintainers to pick them up one by one.
Some patches already got 'Acked-by' replies, which I'd like to keep.
It's probably time to do a bigger sweeping change now and kill it for
good, bypassing the remaining maintainers that haven't acted so far.
We can certainly carry the patches related to arm-soc, and I think
it's worth trying once more to get the scsi patches merged, since there
is a bunch of them. Everything else can probably go directly as a
single pull-request to Linus, or perhaps via Andrew Morton.
Arnd
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, olof@lixom.net,
khilman@linaro.org, linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, patches@linaro.org,
Michael Opdenacker <michael.opdenacker@free-electrons.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/17] ARM: spear: Remove deprecated IRQF_DISABLED flag
Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2014 15:34:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201401031534.37533.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52C5B52E.6080609@linaro.org>
On Thursday 02 January 2014, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 01/02/2014 07:29 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Monday 30 December 2013, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> >> This flag is a NOOP and scheduled to be removed
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
> >
> > Thanks for sending this series. I think the patches are duplicates of stuff that
> > Michael Opdenacker has sent before (actually multiple times). I have no problem
> > applying either version into arm-soc, but I think it would be better to attribute
> > them to Michael, since he came first. Can you two please coordinate and send a
> > single pull request for the arm-soc related patches that haven't made it into
> > linux-next yet?
>
> Michael removed the flag for:
>
> pxa (ed7936f913456e4c01aed75deba6cfaf830fa8cf)
> samsung (fa53d5cdbffbce421c3bd2f937b5626fc044fedc)
> avr32 (7155530d9eb692994d208836e4965da06b17c99d)
> ep93xx (3a71ae4796fdaedbdbdab94660b7b7b5bfe61d1d)
> plat-orion (eb4d552b933ac59c0c8e0604ff435c5208a82679)
>
> The patchset I sent is on top of arm/for-next and finishes to remove
> this flag for arch/arm. It should not overlap with what Michael did.
>
> I'm ok to attribute the patchset to Michael if that can help to accept
> this patchset and kill this flag for arch/arm.
IIRC, Michael actually sent patches for all uses in the entire kernel
previously, but relied on sub-maintainers to pick them up one by one.
Some patches already got 'Acked-by' replies, which I'd like to keep.
It's probably time to do a bigger sweeping change now and kill it for
good, bypassing the remaining maintainers that haven't acted so far.
We can certainly carry the patches related to arm-soc, and I think
it's worth trying once more to get the scsi patches merged, since there
is a bunch of them. Everything else can probably go directly as a
single pull-request to Linus, or perhaps via Andrew Morton.
Arnd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-03 14:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-12-30 16:09 [PATCH 01/17] ARM: spear: Remove deprecated IRQF_DISABLED flag Daniel Lezcano
2013-12-30 16:09 ` Daniel Lezcano
2013-12-30 16:09 ` [PATCH 02/17] ARM: ixp4xx: " Daniel Lezcano
2013-12-30 16:09 ` Daniel Lezcano
2013-12-30 16:09 ` [PATCH 03/17] ARM: sa1100: " Daniel Lezcano
2013-12-30 16:09 ` Daniel Lezcano
2013-12-30 16:09 ` [PATCH 04/17] ARM: mmp: " Daniel Lezcano
2013-12-30 16:09 ` Daniel Lezcano
2013-12-30 16:09 ` [PATCH 05/17] ARM: " Daniel Lezcano
2013-12-30 16:09 ` Daniel Lezcano
2013-12-30 16:09 ` [PATCH 06/17] ARM: cns3xxx: " Daniel Lezcano
2013-12-30 16:09 ` Daniel Lezcano
2013-12-30 16:09 ` [PATCH 07/17] ARM: footbridge: " Daniel Lezcano
2013-12-30 16:09 ` Daniel Lezcano
2013-12-30 16:09 ` [PATCH 08/17] ARM: ks8695: " Daniel Lezcano
2013-12-30 16:09 ` Daniel Lezcano
2013-12-30 16:09 ` [PATCH 09/17] ARM: u300: " Daniel Lezcano
2013-12-30 16:09 ` Daniel Lezcano
2013-12-30 16:09 ` [PATCH 10/17] ARM: rpc: " Daniel Lezcano
2013-12-30 16:09 ` Daniel Lezcano
2013-12-30 16:09 ` [PATCH 11/17] ARM: iop: " Daniel Lezcano
2013-12-30 16:09 ` Daniel Lezcano
2013-12-30 16:09 ` [PATCH 12/17] ARM: integrator: " Daniel Lezcano
2013-12-30 16:09 ` Daniel Lezcano
2013-12-30 16:09 ` [PATCH 13/17] ARM: lpc32xx: " Daniel Lezcano
2013-12-30 16:09 ` Daniel Lezcano
2013-12-30 16:09 ` [PATCH 14/17] ARM: netx: " Daniel Lezcano
2013-12-30 16:09 ` Daniel Lezcano
2013-12-30 16:09 ` [PATCH 15/17] ARM: imx: " Daniel Lezcano
2013-12-30 16:09 ` Daniel Lezcano
2013-12-30 16:09 ` [PATCH 16/17] ARM: ebsa110: " Daniel Lezcano
2013-12-30 16:09 ` Daniel Lezcano
2013-12-30 16:09 ` [PATCH 17/17] ARM: w90x900: " Daniel Lezcano
2013-12-30 16:09 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-01-02 18:29 ` [PATCH 01/17] ARM: spear: " Arnd Bergmann
2014-01-02 18:29 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-01-02 18:51 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-01-02 18:51 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-01-03 14:34 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2014-01-03 14:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201401031534.37533.arnd@arndb.de \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.