From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com>,
Lior Amsalem <alior@marvell.com>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
"Gregory Cl??ment" <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com>,
Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Subject: Re: Issue with the emulated PCI bridge implementation
Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2014 20:01:06 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140103200106.5a0999a3@skate> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201401031322.31433.arnd@arndb.de>
Dear Arnd Bergmann,
On Fri, 3 Jan 2014 13:22:31 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> However the part that made me wonder is that an e1000e with a PCI bridge
> actually /should/not/ need to allocate an I/O space window with a precious
> mbus resource, since AFAIK this adapter does not have an I/O space BARs.
>
> Thomas, can you send the 'lspci -v' output of the system with this card
> to confirm that the I/O space is actually needed? If not, we should probably
> review the core PCI code to see why the bridge code tries to add this window.
I don't have the hardware next to me, but IIRC the card does have an
I/O space. It is not used by the mainline kernel driver, so I have a
hacky patch that modifies the e1000e driver to make it use the I/O
space and do a few I/O reads and writes. I've used that since the
beginning to test I/O space functionality of the pci-mvebu driver.
Digging in the LAKML archive, I found a lspci -v output about the
e1000e, and it has an I/O space:
03:00.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82572EI Gigabit Ethernet Controller (Copper) (rev 06)
Subsystem: Intel Corporation PRO/1000 PT Server Adapter
Control: I/O- Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr+ Stepping- SERR+ FastB2B- DisINTx-
Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast >TAbort- <TAbort- <MAbort- >SERR- <PERR- INTx-
Latency: 0, Cache Line Size: 64 bytes
Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 105
Region 0: Memory at c1000000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=128K]
Region 1: Memory at c1020000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=128K]
Region 2: I/O ports at c0000000 [disabled] [size=32]
[virtual] Expansion ROM at c1100000 [disabled] [size=128K]
Capabilities: [c8] Power Management version 2
Flags: PMEClk- DSI+ D1- D2- AuxCurrent=0mA PME(D0+,D1-,D2-,D3hot+,D3cold+)
Status: D0 NoSoftRst- PME-Enable- DSel=0 DScale=1 PME-
Capabilities: [d0] MSI: Enable- Count=1/1 Maskable- 64bit+
Address: 0000000000000000 Data: 0000
Capabilities: [e0] Express (v1) Endpoint, MSI 00
DevCap: MaxPayload 256 bytes, PhantFunc 0, Latency L0s <512ns, L1 <64us
ExtTag- AttnBtn- AttnInd- PwrInd- RBE- FLReset-
DevCtl: Report errors: Correctable- Non-Fatal- Fatal- Unsupported-
RlxdOrd+ ExtTag- PhantFunc- AuxPwr- NoSnoop+
MaxPayload 128 bytes, MaxReadReq 512 bytes
DevSta: CorrErr- UncorrErr- FatalErr- UnsuppReq- AuxPwr+ TransPend-
LnkCap: Port #0, Speed 2.5GT/s, Width x1, ASPM L0s, Latency L0 <4us, L1 <64us
ClockPM- Surprise- LLActRep- BwNot-
LnkCtl: ASPM Disabled; RCB 64 bytes Disabled- Retrain- CommClk-
ExtSynch- ClockPM- AutWidDis- BWInt- AutBWInt-
LnkSta: Speed 2.5GT/s, Width x1, TrErr- Train- SlotClk+ DLActive- BWMgmt- ABWMgmt-
Capabilities: [100 v1] Advanced Error Reporting
UESta: DLP- SDES- TLP- FCP- CmpltTO- CmpltAbrt- UnxCmplt- RxOF- MalfTLP- ECRC- UnsupReq- ACSViol-
UEMsk: DLP- SDES- TLP- FCP- CmpltTO- CmpltAbrt- UnxCmplt- RxOF- MalfTLP- ECRC- UnsupReq- ACSViol-
UESvrt: DLP+ SDES- TLP- FCP+ CmpltTO- CmpltAbrt- UnxCmplt- RxOF+ MalfTLP+ ECRC- UnsupReq- ACSViol-
CESta: RxErr- BadTLP- BadDLLP- Rollover- Timeout- NonFatalErr-
CEMsk: RxErr- BadTLP- BadDLLP- Rollover- Timeout- NonFatalErr-
AERCap: First Error Pointer: 00, GenCap- CGenEn- ChkCap- ChkEn-
Capabilities: [140 v1] Device Serial Number 00-1b-21-ff-ff-c1-c4-fe
Kernel driver in use: e1000e
Best regards,
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com (Thomas Petazzoni)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Issue with the emulated PCI bridge implementation
Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2014 20:01:06 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140103200106.5a0999a3@skate> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201401031322.31433.arnd@arndb.de>
Dear Arnd Bergmann,
On Fri, 3 Jan 2014 13:22:31 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> However the part that made me wonder is that an e1000e with a PCI bridge
> actually /should/not/ need to allocate an I/O space window with a precious
> mbus resource, since AFAIK this adapter does not have an I/O space BARs.
>
> Thomas, can you send the 'lspci -v' output of the system with this card
> to confirm that the I/O space is actually needed? If not, we should probably
> review the core PCI code to see why the bridge code tries to add this window.
I don't have the hardware next to me, but IIRC the card does have an
I/O space. It is not used by the mainline kernel driver, so I have a
hacky patch that modifies the e1000e driver to make it use the I/O
space and do a few I/O reads and writes. I've used that since the
beginning to test I/O space functionality of the pci-mvebu driver.
Digging in the LAKML archive, I found a lspci -v output about the
e1000e, and it has an I/O space:
03:00.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82572EI Gigabit Ethernet Controller (Copper) (rev 06)
Subsystem: Intel Corporation PRO/1000 PT Server Adapter
Control: I/O- Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr+ Stepping- SERR+ FastB2B- DisINTx-
Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast >TAbort- <TAbort- <MAbort- >SERR- <PERR- INTx-
Latency: 0, Cache Line Size: 64 bytes
Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 105
Region 0: Memory at c1000000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=128K]
Region 1: Memory at c1020000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=128K]
Region 2: I/O ports at c0000000 [disabled] [size=32]
[virtual] Expansion ROM@c1100000 [disabled] [size=128K]
Capabilities: [c8] Power Management version 2
Flags: PMEClk- DSI+ D1- D2- AuxCurrent=0mA PME(D0+,D1-,D2-,D3hot+,D3cold+)
Status: D0 NoSoftRst- PME-Enable- DSel=0 DScale=1 PME-
Capabilities: [d0] MSI: Enable- Count=1/1 Maskable- 64bit+
Address: 0000000000000000 Data: 0000
Capabilities: [e0] Express (v1) Endpoint, MSI 00
DevCap: MaxPayload 256 bytes, PhantFunc 0, Latency L0s <512ns, L1 <64us
ExtTag- AttnBtn- AttnInd- PwrInd- RBE- FLReset-
DevCtl: Report errors: Correctable- Non-Fatal- Fatal- Unsupported-
RlxdOrd+ ExtTag- PhantFunc- AuxPwr- NoSnoop+
MaxPayload 128 bytes, MaxReadReq 512 bytes
DevSta: CorrErr- UncorrErr- FatalErr- UnsuppReq- AuxPwr+ TransPend-
LnkCap: Port #0, Speed 2.5GT/s, Width x1, ASPM L0s, Latency L0 <4us, L1 <64us
ClockPM- Surprise- LLActRep- BwNot-
LnkCtl: ASPM Disabled; RCB 64 bytes Disabled- Retrain- CommClk-
ExtSynch- ClockPM- AutWidDis- BWInt- AutBWInt-
LnkSta: Speed 2.5GT/s, Width x1, TrErr- Train- SlotClk+ DLActive- BWMgmt- ABWMgmt-
Capabilities: [100 v1] Advanced Error Reporting
UESta: DLP- SDES- TLP- FCP- CmpltTO- CmpltAbrt- UnxCmplt- RxOF- MalfTLP- ECRC- UnsupReq- ACSViol-
UEMsk: DLP- SDES- TLP- FCP- CmpltTO- CmpltAbrt- UnxCmplt- RxOF- MalfTLP- ECRC- UnsupReq- ACSViol-
UESvrt: DLP+ SDES- TLP- FCP+ CmpltTO- CmpltAbrt- UnxCmplt- RxOF+ MalfTLP+ ECRC- UnsupReq- ACSViol-
CESta: RxErr- BadTLP- BadDLLP- Rollover- Timeout- NonFatalErr-
CEMsk: RxErr- BadTLP- BadDLLP- Rollover- Timeout- NonFatalErr-
AERCap: First Error Pointer: 00, GenCap- CGenEn- ChkCap- ChkEn-
Capabilities: [140 v1] Device Serial Number 00-1b-21-ff-ff-c1-c4-fe
Kernel driver in use: e1000e
Best regards,
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-03 19:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-12-26 15:05 Issue with the emulated PCI bridge implementation Thomas Petazzoni
2013-12-26 15:05 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-12-26 15:52 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-12-26 15:52 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2014-01-02 21:41 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-01-02 21:41 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-01-03 0:26 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2014-01-03 0:26 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2014-01-03 12:22 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-01-03 12:22 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-01-03 18:44 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2014-01-03 18:44 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2014-01-03 19:03 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-01-03 19:03 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-01-03 19:01 ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
2014-01-03 19:01 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2014-01-03 19:04 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-01-03 19:04 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-01-03 19:10 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2014-01-03 19:10 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2014-01-03 19:13 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-01-03 19:13 ` Arnd Bergmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140103200106.5a0999a3@skate \
--to=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=alior@marvell.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com \
--cc=gregory.clement@free-electrons.com \
--cc=jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.