From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2014 07:53:24 -0800 Subject: [Cluster-devel] [PATCH 00/21] Consolidate Posix ACL implementation V3 In-Reply-To: <20131220131635.650823732@bombadil.infradead.org> References: <20131220131635.650823732@bombadil.infradead.org> Message-ID: <20140107155324.GA24113@infradead.org> List-Id: To: cluster-devel.redhat.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 05:16:35AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > This series consolidates the various cut'n'pasted Posix ACL implementations > into a single common one based on the ->get_acl method Linus added a while > ago and a new ->set_acl counterpart. > > This remove ~1800 lines of code and provides a single place to implement > various nasty little gems of the semantics. Any more comments? Al, what's the best way to make sure this doesn't miss 3.14? From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]:55961 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750933AbaAGPx1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Jan 2014 10:53:27 -0500 Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2014 07:53:24 -0800 From: Christoph Hellwig To: viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, Mark Fasheh , Joel Becker , reiserfs-devel@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com, jfs-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net, cluster-devel@redhat.com, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, Andreas Gruenbacher Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/21] Consolidate Posix ACL implementation V3 Message-ID: <20140107155324.GA24113@infradead.org> References: <20131220131635.650823732@bombadil.infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20131220131635.650823732@bombadil.infradead.org> Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 05:16:35AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > This series consolidates the various cut'n'pasted Posix ACL implementations > into a single common one based on the ->get_acl method Linus added a while > ago and a new ->set_acl counterpart. > > This remove ~1800 lines of code and provides a single place to implement > various nasty little gems of the semantics. Any more comments? Al, what's the best way to make sure this doesn't miss 3.14? From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/21] Consolidate Posix ACL implementation V3 Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2014 07:53:24 -0800 Message-ID: <20140107155324.GA24113@infradead.org> References: <20131220131635.650823732@bombadil.infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: linux-fsdevel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-btrfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-ext4-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-f2fs-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org, linux-mtd-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, Mark Fasheh , Joel Becker , reiserfs-devel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, xfs-VZNHf3L845pBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org, jfs-discussion-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org, cluster-devel-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, linux-nfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Andreas Gruenbacher To: viro-RmSDqhL/yNMiFSDQTTA3OLVCufUGDwFn@public.gmane.org Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20131220131635.650823732-PfSpb0PWhxZc2C7mugBRk2EX/6BAtgUQ@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-nfs-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 05:16:35AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > This series consolidates the various cut'n'pasted Posix ACL implementations > into a single common one based on the ->get_acl method Linus added a while > ago and a new ->set_acl counterpart. > > This remove ~1800 lines of code and provides a single place to implement > various nasty little gems of the semantics. Any more comments? Al, what's the best way to make sure this doesn't miss 3.14? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2014 07:53:24 -0800 From: Christoph Hellwig To: viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/21] Consolidate Posix ACL implementation V3 Message-ID: <20140107155324.GA24113@infradead.org> References: <20131220131635.650823732@bombadil.infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20131220131635.650823732@bombadil.infradead.org> Cc: Andreas Gruenbacher , xfs@oss.sgi.com, Mark Fasheh , reiserfs-devel@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, cluster-devel@redhat.com, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, Joel Becker , jfs-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 05:16:35AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > This series consolidates the various cut'n'pasted Posix ACL implementations > into a single common one based on the ->get_acl method Linus added a while > ago and a new ->set_acl counterpart. > > This remove ~1800 lines of code and provides a single place to implement > various nasty little gems of the semantics. Any more comments? Al, what's the best way to make sure this doesn't miss 3.14? From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay2.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.29]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC5AF7F3F for ; Tue, 7 Jan 2014 09:53:38 -0600 (CST) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by relay2.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5A0E304077 for ; Tue, 7 Jan 2014 07:53:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id WwLCC0r64qXAz0Yw (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 07 Jan 2014 07:53:36 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2014 07:53:24 -0800 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/21] Consolidate Posix ACL implementation V3 Message-ID: <20140107155324.GA24113@infradead.org> References: <20131220131635.650823732@bombadil.infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20131220131635.650823732@bombadil.infradead.org> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk Cc: Andreas Gruenbacher , xfs@oss.sgi.com, Mark Fasheh , reiserfs-devel@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, cluster-devel@redhat.com, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, Joel Becker , jfs-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 05:16:35AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > This series consolidates the various cut'n'pasted Posix ACL implementations > into a single common one based on the ->get_acl method Linus added a while > ago and a new ->set_acl counterpart. > > This remove ~1800 lines of code and provides a single place to implement > various nasty little gems of the semantics. Any more comments? Al, what's the best way to make sure this doesn't miss 3.14? _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs