From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753989AbaAGTQX (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Jan 2014 14:16:23 -0500 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:58675 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753005AbaAGTQL (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Jan 2014 14:16:11 -0500 Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2014 11:16:39 -0800 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Shuah Khan Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, "shuahkhan@gmail.com" Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.12 000/144] 3.12.7-stable review Message-ID: <20140107191639.GA2825@kroah.com> References: <20140106223745.326293132@linuxfoundation.org> <52CC5062.3080708@samsung.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <52CC5062.3080708@samsung.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.22 (2013-10-16) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jan 07, 2014 at 12:07:14PM -0700, Shuah Khan wrote: > On 01/06/2014 03:36 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > >This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.12.7 release. > >There are 144 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > >to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > >let me know. > > > >Responses should be made by Wed Jan 8 22:37:25 UTC 2014. > >Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > >The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/stable-review/patch-3.12.7-rc1.gz > >and the diffstat can be found below. > > > >thanks, > > > >greg k-h > > Patches testing - passed > Compile testing - passed > Boot testing - passed > dmesg regression testing - passed > > Test systems > > Samsung Series 9 900X4C Intel Corei5 (3.4 and later) > HP ProBook 6475b AMD A10-4600M APU with Radeon(tm) HD Graphics > Dell OptiPlex 790 Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2400 > > Detailed test status > > Patches applied cleanly > dmesgs look good. No regressions compared to the previous dmesgs for this > release. dmesg emerg, crit, alert, err are clean. No regressions in warn. Just in time for me to do a -rc2 release for this, and the 3.10 -rc1 announcement, sorry :) thanks for testing all 3 of these and letting me know. greg k-h