From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Lee Jones Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/11] ASoC: twl4030: Remove local reg cache Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2014 11:18:16 +0000 Message-ID: <20140108111816.GH19974@lee--X1> References: <1388755676-16036-1-git-send-email-peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> <1388755676-16036-9-git-send-email-peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> <20140108080535.GA19974@lee--X1> <52CD318E.3090706@ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <52CD318E.3090706@ti.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Peter Ujfalusi Cc: Liam Girdwood , Mark Brown , Samuel Ortiz , alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org > >> Depend on the regmap reg cache implementation for register caching= done in > >> the twl-core driver. > >> The local register cache can be removed and we can keep only shado= w copies > >> of certain ctl registers for pop noise reduction. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi > >> --- > >> sound/soc/codecs/twl4030.c | 207 ++++++++++++++------------------= ------------- > >> 1 file changed, 63 insertions(+), 144 deletions(-) > >=20 > > Which commit is the patch-set based on? This patch doesn't apply. >=20 > When I have sent it it was mainline 3.13-rc6, Now I rebased my series= on > 3.13-rc7 locally. >=20 > > At a guess I'd say it's becuase this commit is applied on my tree: > >=20 > > mfd: twl6040: reg_defaults support for regmap >=20 > I also have the twl6040 series underneath the twl4030 patches in my w= orking > branch and the two series does not touch the same files. >=20 > > Would you mind rebasing on my ASoC branch please? > >=20 > > git://git.linaro.org/people/lee.jones/mfd.git ib-asoc >=20 > I have applied this twl4030 series on this branch and all patches (fr= om 01 to > 11) applied w/o issue, not even offset difference. >=20 > Not sure what is going on since the sound/soc/codecs/twl4030.c file i= s > identical in 3.13-rc7 and in your ib-asoc branch so the series should= apply > cleanly for you. Now that is strange. I just attempted to apply them again and they did so cleanly. I'm not sure what happened, but they're find now. Applied, thanks. --=20 Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org =E2=94=82 Open source software for ARM SoCs =46ollow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog