From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg Rose Subject: Re: [net-next 05/15] i40e: add a comment on barrier and fix panic on reset Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2014 09:17:35 -0800 Message-ID: <20140109091735.00002cf0@unknown> References: <1389271944-26227-1-git-send-email-jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com> <1389271944-26227-6-git-send-email-jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com> <52CEB538.50505@cogentembedded.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Jeff Kirsher , , , , , "Mitch Williams" , Jesse Brandeburg To: Sergei Shtylyov Return-path: Received: from mga11.intel.com ([192.55.52.93]:42024 "EHLO mga11.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751705AbaAIRRj (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Jan 2014 12:17:39 -0500 In-Reply-To: <52CEB538.50505@cogentembedded.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, 9 Jan 2014 18:42:00 +0400 Sergei Shtylyov wrote: > Hello. > > On 09-01-2014 16:52, Jeff Kirsher wrote: > > > From: Greg Rose > > > The memory barrier used in maybe_stop_tx can use a comment. > > > Also add checks to VSI->rx_rings to ensure a kernel panic is not > > induced. > > Don't see why this is made in one patch instead of two since the > two things look completely unrelated and even modifying different > files. > > > Change-ID: I48cc1bf1d6cf301818155b737edeef77c0d790c7 > > Change-ID: I1363a8445fbf521a26267849966296ed55f43ad8 > > Why even 2 of them? > > > Signed-off-by: Greg Rose > > Signed-off-by: Mitch Williams > > Signed-off-by: Jesse Brandeburg > > Tested-by: Kavindya Deegala > > Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher > > WBR, Sergei > Yes, it's apparent that two different internal patches were compressed together. If its unacceptable to do this then I'll speak to Jeff about splitting them. - Greg