From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matt Fleming Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] mm: create generic early_ioremap() support Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2014 10:15:42 +0000 Message-ID: <20140109101542.GD18441@console-pimps.org> References: <1389062120-31896-1-git-send-email-msalter@redhat.com> <1389062120-31896-2-git-send-email-msalter@redhat.com> <52CC89B4.4060300@zytor.com> <1389197388.29144.37.camel@deneb.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1389197388.29144.37.camel@deneb.redhat.com> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: Mark Salter Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, patches@linaro.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Andrew Morton , Arnd Bergmann , Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , Russell King , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Dave Young List-Id: linux-arch.vger.kernel.org On Wed, 08 Jan, at 11:09:48AM, Mark Salter wrote: > > Ok, that sounds like a good idea. I'm uncertain how best to coordinate > with Dave Young's patch series to avoid conflicts. His first patch does > the signature change (and adds the early_memunmap function but that > isn't used anywhere): > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/12/20/143 > > Any thoughts on how best to avoid potential merge conflicts here? Dave's patch hasn't been picked up by anyone so far, so you could incorporate it into your series. -- Matt Fleming, Intel Open Source Technology Center -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from arkanian.console-pimps.org ([212.110.184.194]:34732 "EHLO arkanian.console-pimps.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750851AbaAIKPt (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Jan 2014 05:15:49 -0500 Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2014 10:15:42 +0000 From: Matt Fleming Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] mm: create generic early_ioremap() support Message-ID: <20140109101542.GD18441@console-pimps.org> References: <1389062120-31896-1-git-send-email-msalter@redhat.com> <1389062120-31896-2-git-send-email-msalter@redhat.com> <52CC89B4.4060300@zytor.com> <1389197388.29144.37.camel@deneb.redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1389197388.29144.37.camel@deneb.redhat.com> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Mark Salter Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, patches@linaro.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Andrew Morton , Arnd Bergmann , Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , Russell King , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Dave Young Message-ID: <20140109101542.jaKozKZYiRiecxB2tzKfJk1K6YUcIO2SeTeSqYJvHjQ@z> On Wed, 08 Jan, at 11:09:48AM, Mark Salter wrote: > > Ok, that sounds like a good idea. I'm uncertain how best to coordinate > with Dave Young's patch series to avoid conflicts. His first patch does > the signature change (and adds the early_memunmap function but that > isn't used anywhere): > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/12/20/143 > > Any thoughts on how best to avoid potential merge conflicts here? Dave's patch hasn't been picked up by anyone so far, so you could incorporate it into your series. -- Matt Fleming, Intel Open Source Technology Center From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: matt@console-pimps.org (Matt Fleming) Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2014 10:15:42 +0000 Subject: [PATCH v2 1/5] mm: create generic early_ioremap() support In-Reply-To: <1389197388.29144.37.camel@deneb.redhat.com> References: <1389062120-31896-1-git-send-email-msalter@redhat.com> <1389062120-31896-2-git-send-email-msalter@redhat.com> <52CC89B4.4060300@zytor.com> <1389197388.29144.37.camel@deneb.redhat.com> Message-ID: <20140109101542.GD18441@console-pimps.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wed, 08 Jan, at 11:09:48AM, Mark Salter wrote: > > Ok, that sounds like a good idea. I'm uncertain how best to coordinate > with Dave Young's patch series to avoid conflicts. His first patch does > the signature change (and adds the early_memunmap function but that > isn't used anywhere): > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/12/20/143 > > Any thoughts on how best to avoid potential merge conflicts here? Dave's patch hasn't been picked up by anyone so far, so you could incorporate it into your series. -- Matt Fleming, Intel Open Source Technology Center