All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
Cc: viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, dchinner@redhat.com, hch@lst.de,
	eric.dumazet@gmail.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs/inode: No need to take ->i_lock right after alloc_inode()
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2014 10:22:29 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140110092229.GA556@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1524545.iNFYXWHlaf@sandpuppy>

On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 11:21:13AM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> > In all three cases, new_inode_pseudo(), iget_locked() and iget5_locked(),
> > we own the new inode exclusively at this point and therefore taking
> > ->i_lock to protect ->i_state/->i_hash against concurrent access is
> > superfluous.

We'd still need some sort of barrier to make sure the state is visible
to all CPUs before it becomes visible, usually by another spin_unlock
happing later.  If you have a workload where removing these is critical
please document these issues in the code and resubmit it with an explanation
of the workload where it helps.  If it's just a cleanup I wouldn't bother
with it.

  reply	other threads:[~2014-01-10  9:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-12-14 20:54 [PATCH] fs/inode: No need to take ->i_lock right after alloc_inode() Richard Weinberger
2014-01-08 10:21 ` Richard Weinberger
2014-01-10  9:22   ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2014-01-10  9:48     ` Richard Weinberger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140110092229.GA556@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=dchinner@redhat.com \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=richard@nod.at \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.