From: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: benh@kernel.crashing.org
Cc: michael@ellerman.id.au, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
paulus@samba.org, anton@samba.org
Subject: [PATCH] Revert "pseries/iommu: Remove DDW on kexec"
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2014 15:10:41 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140110231041.GB12343@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140110230938.GA12343@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
After reverting 25ebc45b93452d0bc60271f178237123c4b26808
("powerpc/pseries/iommu: remove default window before attempting DDW
manipulation"), we no longer remove the base window in enable_ddw.
Therefore, we no longer need to reset the DMA window state in
find_existing_ddw_windows(). We can instead go back to what was done
before, which simply reuses the previous configuration, if any. Further,
this removes the final caller of the reset-pe-dma-windows call, so
remove those functions.
This fixes an EEH on kdump with the ipr driver. The EEH occurs, because
the initcall removes the DDW configuration (64-bit DMA window), but
doesn't ensure the ops are via the IOMMU -- a DMA operation occurs
during probe (still investigating this) and we EEH.
This reverts commit 14b6f00f8a4fdec5ccd45a0710284de301a61628.
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/iommu.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/iommu.c
index ed6e553..dc79e7c 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/iommu.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/iommu.c
@@ -783,68 +783,33 @@ static u64 find_existing_ddw(struct device_node *pdn)
return dma_addr;
}
-static void __restore_default_window(struct eeh_dev *edev,
- u32 ddw_restore_token)
-{
- u32 cfg_addr;
- u64 buid;
- int ret;
-
- /*
- * Get the config address and phb buid of the PE window.
- * Rely on eeh to retrieve this for us.
- * Retrieve them from the pci device, not the node with the
- * dma-window property
- */
- cfg_addr = edev->config_addr;
- if (edev->pe_config_addr)
- cfg_addr = edev->pe_config_addr;
- buid = edev->phb->buid;
-
- do {
- ret = rtas_call(ddw_restore_token, 3, 1, NULL, cfg_addr,
- BUID_HI(buid), BUID_LO(buid));
- } while (rtas_busy_delay(ret));
- pr_info("ibm,reset-pe-dma-windows(%x) %x %x %x returned %d\n",
- ddw_restore_token, cfg_addr, BUID_HI(buid), BUID_LO(buid), ret);
-}
-
static int find_existing_ddw_windows(void)
{
+ int len;
struct device_node *pdn;
+ struct direct_window *window;
const struct dynamic_dma_window_prop *direct64;
- const u32 *ddw_extensions;
if (!firmware_has_feature(FW_FEATURE_LPAR))
return 0;
for_each_node_with_property(pdn, DIRECT64_PROPNAME) {
- direct64 = of_get_property(pdn, DIRECT64_PROPNAME, NULL);
+ direct64 = of_get_property(pdn, DIRECT64_PROPNAME, &len);
if (!direct64)
continue;
- /*
- * We need to ensure the IOMMU table is active when we
- * return from the IOMMU setup so that the common code
- * can clear the table or find the holes. To that end,
- * first, remove any existing DDW configuration.
- */
- remove_ddw(pdn);
+ window = kzalloc(sizeof(*window), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!window || len < sizeof(struct dynamic_dma_window_prop)) {
+ kfree(window);
+ remove_ddw(pdn);
+ continue;
+ }
- /*
- * Second, if we are running on a new enough level of
- * firmware where the restore API is present, use it to
- * restore the 32-bit window, which was removed in
- * create_ddw.
- * If the API is not present, then create_ddw couldn't
- * have removed the 32-bit window in the first place, so
- * removing the DDW configuration should be sufficient.
- */
- ddw_extensions = of_get_property(pdn, "ibm,ddw-extensions",
- NULL);
- if (ddw_extensions && ddw_extensions[0] > 0)
- __restore_default_window(of_node_to_eeh_dev(pdn),
- ddw_extensions[1]);
+ window->device = pdn;
+ window->prop = direct64;
+ spin_lock(&direct_window_list_lock);
+ list_add(&window->list, &direct_window_list);
+ spin_unlock(&direct_window_list_lock);
}
return 0;
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-10 23:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-10 23:09 [PATCH] Revert "powerpc/pseries/iommu: remove default window before attempting DDW manipulation" Nishanth Aravamudan
2014-01-10 23:10 ` Nishanth Aravamudan [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140110231041.GB12343@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=nacc@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=anton@samba.org \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=michael@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.