diff for duplicates of <20140112092330.4baa2c77@jawa>

diff --git a/a/1.1.hdr b/a/1.1.hdr
deleted file mode 100644
index bab376c..0000000
--- a/a/1.1.hdr
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,2 +0,0 @@
-Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
-Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
diff --git a/a/1.2.bin b/a/1.2.bin
deleted file mode 100644
index 5535490..0000000
--- a/a/1.2.bin
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,7 +0,0 @@
------BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
-Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
-
-iEYEARECAAYFAlLSUQIACgkQf9/hG2YwgjGZVwCeItTtVdeo5rswjO5ktNGQwlo4
-zdsAn3eLViXLpVlkdkJnZxgEzVVYZZOP
-=yFzF
------END PGP SIGNATURE-----
diff --git a/a/1.2.hdr b/a/1.2.hdr
deleted file mode 100644
index cdb217b..0000000
--- a/a/1.2.hdr
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,2 +0,0 @@
-Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
-Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc
diff --git a/a/1.1.txt b/N1/1.txt
similarity index 96%
rename from a/1.1.txt
rename to N1/1.txt
index 16ab239..30c45a8 100644
--- a/a/1.1.txt
+++ b/N1/1.txt
@@ -120,18 +120,18 @@ Yes, that was my point.
 > >>>>> +
 > >>>>
 > >>>> What do you think about adding those parameters (like CPU
-> >>>> dividers) as an attribute to /cpus/cpu@0 node?
+> >>>> dividers) as an attribute to /cpus/cpu at 0 node?
 > >>>
 > >>> Not in CPU node but may be in clock controller node since these
 > >>> values are actually used by the clock controller.
 > >>
-> >> /cpus/cpu@0 seems like a good place for them (since those DIVs are
+> >> /cpus/cpu at 0 seems like a good place for them (since those DIVs are
 > >> related to core)
 > >
 > > DIVs belong to the clock controller, not the CPU, and are addressed
 > > from the clock controller address space.
 > 
-> I also think that the contents of cpu@0 node should be limited only
+> I also think that the contents of cpu at 0 node should be limited only
 > to CPU specific data. Personally I don't even like the idea of having 
 > operating points there - I would rather see frequency limits there,
 > i.e. maximum frequency allowed at given voltage; specific frequency
@@ -424,8 +424,15 @@ I cannot agree here, as stated at the above comment.
 > 
 > _______________________________________________
 > linux-arm-kernel mailing list
-> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
+> linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
 > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
 
 Best regards,
 Lukasz Majewski
+-------------- next part --------------
+A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
+Name: signature.asc
+Type: application/pgp-signature
+Size: 198 bytes
+Desc: not available
+URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20140112/52724837/attachment.sig>
diff --git a/a/2.hdr b/a/2.hdr
deleted file mode 100644
index 4b86001..0000000
--- a/a/2.hdr
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,4 +0,0 @@
-Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
-MIME-Version: 1.0
-Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
-Content-Disposition: inline
diff --git a/a/2.txt b/a/2.txt
deleted file mode 100644
index 8133cf0..0000000
--- a/a/2.txt
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,4 +0,0 @@
-_______________________________________________
-linux-arm-kernel mailing list
-linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
-http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest
index 1cb117a..78a853d 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N1/content_digest
@@ -5,22 +5,11 @@
  "ref\020140110151812.5104cc92@amdc2363\0"
  "ref\0CAJuA9aj3ca9VNsQ9cadVH8pUpyYeaht3DufT3DW4jXuEN5BudA@mail.gmail.com\0"
  "ref\052D1FB94.1030006@gmail.com\0"
- "From\0Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@majess.pl>\0"
- "Subject\0Re: [PATCH 3/6] clk: samsung: register cpu clock provider for exynos4210 SoC\0"
+ "From\0l.majewski@majess.pl (Lukasz Majewski)\0"
+ "Subject\0[PATCH 3/6] clk: samsung: register cpu clock provider for exynos4210 SoC\0"
  "Date\0Sun, 12 Jan 2014 09:23:30 +0100\0"
- "To\0Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@gmail.com>"
-  Thomas Abraham <ta.omasab@gmail.com>
- " thomas.ab@samsung.com\0"
- "Cc\0devicetree@vger.kernel.org"
-  Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com>
-  kgene.kim@samsung.com
-  Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
-  t.figa@samsung.com
-  cpufreq@vger.kernel.org
-  linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org
-  Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
- " linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\0"
- "\02:1.1\0"
+ "To\0linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\0"
+ "\00:1\0"
  "b\0"
  "Dear All,\n"
  "\n"
@@ -144,18 +133,18 @@
  "> >>>>> +\n"
  "> >>>>\n"
  "> >>>> What do you think about adding those parameters (like CPU\n"
- "> >>>> dividers) as an attribute to /cpus/cpu@0 node?\n"
+ "> >>>> dividers) as an attribute to /cpus/cpu at 0 node?\n"
  "> >>>\n"
  "> >>> Not in CPU node but may be in clock controller node since these\n"
  "> >>> values are actually used by the clock controller.\n"
  "> >>\n"
- "> >> /cpus/cpu@0 seems like a good place for them (since those DIVs are\n"
+ "> >> /cpus/cpu at 0 seems like a good place for them (since those DIVs are\n"
  "> >> related to core)\n"
  "> >\n"
  "> > DIVs belong to the clock controller, not the CPU, and are addressed\n"
  "> > from the clock controller address space.\n"
  "> \n"
- "> I also think that the contents of cpu@0 node should be limited only\n"
+ "> I also think that the contents of cpu at 0 node should be limited only\n"
  "> to CPU specific data. Personally I don't even like the idea of having \n"
  "> operating points there - I would rather see frequency limits there,\n"
  "> i.e. maximum frequency allowed at given voltage; specific frequency\n"
@@ -448,26 +437,17 @@
  "> \n"
  "> _______________________________________________\n"
  "> linux-arm-kernel mailing list\n"
- "> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\n"
+ "> linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org\n"
  "> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel\n"
  "\n"
  "Best regards,\n"
- Lukasz Majewski
- "\02:1.2\0"
- "fn\0signature.asc\0"
- "b\0"
- "-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\n"
- "Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)\n"
- "\n"
- "iEYEARECAAYFAlLSUQIACgkQf9/hG2YwgjGZVwCeItTtVdeo5rswjO5ktNGQwlo4\n"
- "zdsAn3eLViXLpVlkdkJnZxgEzVVYZZOP\n"
- "=yFzF\n"
- "-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----\n"
- "\01:2\0"
- "b\0"
- "_______________________________________________\n"
- "linux-arm-kernel mailing list\n"
- "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\n"
- http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
+ "Lukasz Majewski\n"
+ "-------------- next part --------------\n"
+ "A non-text attachment was scrubbed...\n"
+ "Name: signature.asc\n"
+ "Type: application/pgp-signature\n"
+ "Size: 198 bytes\n"
+ "Desc: not available\n"
+ URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20140112/52724837/attachment.sig>
 
-1fb9b4a7a792451b3816ffc382280824b5782d519ff06b51d8d1717f66f79cd9
+3a29b9840f1503b60c143241f7ac3afb699feb84575820b9c6b2b6d59c9aaf9d
