From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dan Carpenter Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 07:54:22 +0000 Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] [patch v2] i40e: potential array underflow in i40e_vc_process_vf_msg() Message-Id: <20140113075422.GA7444@mwanda> List-Id: References: <309B89C4C689E141A5FF6A0C5FB2118B7312AC70@ORSMSX101.amr.corp.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <309B89C4C689E141A5FF6A0C5FB2118B7312AC70@ORSMSX101.amr.corp.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 10:19:58PM +0000, Brown, Aaron F wrote: > Thanks Dan, I have applied it to Jeff's tree. It still did not apply > cleanly but I went ahead and spun a new patch with the change to get > it into the queue. Not sure what was going on, only visible > difference I could see is the original tree seemed to contain: > --------------------------------------------------------- > u32 v_retval, u8 *msg, u16 msglen) > { > --------------------------------------------------------- > While the patch was looking for: > ------------------------------------------------------------ > u32 v_retval, u8 *msg, u16 msglen) { > ------------------------------------------------------------ > Sorry about that, but I think the problem is in one of your mail servers somewhere. The email in the marc.info archive has the curly braces in the right place. http://marc.info/?l=kernel-janitors&m8943435730292&w=2 regards, dan carpenter