All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Baruch Siach <baruch-NswTu9S1W3P6gbPvEgmw2w@public.gmane.org>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa-z923LK4zBo2bacvFa/9K2g@public.gmane.org>
Cc: linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: designware: remove HAVE_CLK build dependecy
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 14:18:06 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140113121806.GO4944@tarshish> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140105050410.GA5316@tarshish>

Hi Wolfram,

Ping?

On Sun, Jan 05, 2014 at 07:04:10AM +0200, Baruch Siach wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 04, 2014 at 11:48:46PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 10:31:19AM +0200, Baruch Siach wrote:
> > > Since 93abe8e4 (clk: add non CONFIG_HAVE_CLK routines) code using clk.h need
> > > not depend on HAVE_CLK. Also, remove a redundant clk.h include from core driver
> > > file.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Baruch Siach <baruch-NswTu9S1W3P6gbPvEgmw2w@public.gmane.org>
> > 
> > Is the patch description correct? The core driver simply does not need
> > clk.h and thus the dependency. No redundancy here, or?
> 
> The platform code (i2c-designware-platform.c) uses the clk API, but the 
> Kconfig dependency on HAVE_CLK is not needed anymore. The core code 
> (i2c-designware-core.c) doesn't use clk. Originally the driver was in a single 
> file, including the clk handling. This code has been moved to the platform 
> file, so the core file doesn't need the clk.h include.
> 
> Logically, these are two separate issues. But I'm not sure it is worth 
> splitting into two patches. What do you think?

baruch

-- 
     http://baruch.siach.name/blog/                  ~. .~   Tk Open Systems
=}------------------------------------------------ooO--U--Ooo------------{=
   - baruch-NswTu9S1W3P6gbPvEgmw2w@public.gmane.org - tel: +972.2.679.5364, http://www.tkos.co.il -

  reply	other threads:[~2014-01-13 12:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-12-30  8:31 [PATCH] i2c: designware: remove HAVE_CLK build dependecy Baruch Siach
     [not found] ` <f3ebead75d45623e4b649c7a8d0112584ffd1788.1388392279.git.baruch-NswTu9S1W3P6gbPvEgmw2w@public.gmane.org>
2014-01-04 22:48   ` Wolfram Sang
2014-01-05  5:04     ` Baruch Siach
2014-01-13 12:18       ` Baruch Siach [this message]
2014-01-13 12:39       ` Wolfram Sang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140113121806.GO4944@tarshish \
    --to=baruch-nswtu9s1w3p6gbpvegmw2w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=wsa-z923LK4zBo2bacvFa/9K2g@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.