From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
ebiederm@xmission.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] sysfs_rename_link() and its usage
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 10:21:35 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140114182135.GA29296@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140114171740.GB1867@redhat.com>
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 06:17:40PM +0100, Veaceslav Falico wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm hitting a strange issue and/or I'm completely lost in sysfs internals.
>
> Consider having two net_device *a, *b; which are registered normally.
> Now, to create a link from /sys/class/net/a->name/linkname to b, one should
> use:
>
> sysfs_create_link(&(a->dev.kobj), &(b->dev.kobj), linkname);
>
> To remove it, even simpler:
>
> sysfs_remove_link(&(a->dev.kobj), linkname);
>
> This works like a charm. However, if I want to use (obviously, with the
> symlink present):
>
> sysfs_rename_link(&(a->dev.kobj), &(b->dev.kobj), oldname, newname);
You forgot the namespace option to this call, what kernel version are
you using here?
> this fails with:
>
> "sysfs: ns invalid in 'a->name' for 'oldname'"
Looks like the namespace for this link isn't valid.
> in
>
> 608 struct sysfs_dirent *sysfs_find_dirent(struct sysfs_dirent *parent_sd,
> ...
> 615 if (!!sysfs_ns_type(parent_sd) != !!ns) {
> 616 WARN(1, KERN_WARNING "sysfs: ns %s in '%s' for '%s'\n",
> 617 sysfs_ns_type(parent_sd) ? "required" : "invalid",
> 618 parent_sd->s_name, name);
> 619 return NULL;
> 620 }
>
> Code path:
> warn_slowpath_fmt+0x46/0x50
> sysfs_get_dirent_ns+0x30/0x80
> sysfs_find_dirent+0x84/0x110
> sysfs_get_dirent_ns+0x3e/0x80
> sysfs_rename_link_ns+0x54/0xd0
>
> I have no idea what this code means. Is there any reason for it to
> fail (i.e. am I doing something wrong?) or I've hit a bug?
What exactly are you trying to do here? Care to provide a pointer to
your code somewhere?
> I've tested the only user of it (bridge) - and it works fine, however it's
> not using its own net_device's kobject but rather its own dir.
The driver core also uses this function, and it works there, so I'd
blame your code :)
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-14 18:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-14 17:17 [RFC] sysfs_rename_link() and its usage Veaceslav Falico
2014-01-14 18:21 ` Greg KH [this message]
2014-01-14 19:12 ` Veaceslav Falico
2014-01-14 19:31 ` Greg KH
2014-01-14 21:06 ` Veaceslav Falico
2014-01-14 21:12 ` Greg KH
2014-01-15 1:35 ` Eric W. Biederman
2014-01-15 14:16 ` Tejun Heo
2014-01-15 23:25 ` Eric W. Biederman
2014-01-15 23:32 ` Tejun Heo
2014-01-16 0:11 ` Veaceslav Falico
2014-01-16 23:34 ` Eric W. Biederman
2014-01-15 3:46 ` Ding Tianhong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140114182135.GA29296@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vfalico@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.