From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Ivan Novick <inovick@gopivotal.com>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: xfs: blocked for more than 120 seconds
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 08:58:12 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140116215812.GS3431@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALNbWOb8+85bKhyKkJ0qHw9FqK8ogW+ePOcUouE=_MBRukRmng@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 11:51:52AM -0800, Ivan Novick wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am running a server with heavy workload on a XFS mount:
> /dev/mapper/v2-d1 on /d/d1 type xfs (rw,nodev,noatime,inode64,allocsize=16m)
> 2.6.32-424.el6.x86_64 #1 SMP Mon Oct 14 20:11:50 EDT 2013 x86_64 x86_64
> x86_64 GNU/Linux
>
> We get errors in log indicating processes are blocked for more than 120
> seconds.
>
> 1) Is this expected during heavy workload?
> 2) What would be the impact on the processes? Are they basically hung in
> userspace waiting for IO?
> 3) Is there anything we tune here?
>
> Below is the output.
>
> Cheers,
> Ivan Novick
>
> INFO: task flush-253:1:6882 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
> Tainted: P --------------- 2.6.32-424.el6.x86_64 #1
Proprietary kernel module taint on a RHEL/centos kernel, so there's
no guarantee anyone will be able to debug this here. If it's RHEL
you are using, please report it through your support channels...
> "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
> flush-253:1 D 0000000000000000 0 6882 2 0x00000000
> ffff881011fa5690 0000000000000046 0000000000000000 ffff881013cba040
> 0000000000000001 ffff88012a447d40 ffff881013cba040 ffff881016eb4830
> ffff881013cba5f8 ffff881011fa5fd8 000000000000fbc8 ffff881013cba5f8
> Call Trace:
> [<ffffffff815289d3>] io_schedule+0x73/0xc0
> [<ffffffff81267d18>] get_request_wait+0x108/0x1d0
> [<ffffffff8109b4a0>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x40
> [<ffffffff812618ce>] ? elv_merge+0x17e/0x1c0
> [<ffffffff81267e79>] blk_queue_bio+0x99/0x620
> [<ffffffff81266f00>] generic_make_request+0x240/0x5a0
Waiting for IO completion. Looks like you've either severely
overloaded your storage subsystem, or it's died and isn't responding
anymore.
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-16 21:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-16 19:51 xfs: blocked for more than 120 seconds Ivan Novick
2014-01-16 21:58 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140116215812.GS3431@dastard \
--to=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=inovick@gopivotal.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.