From: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [rcu] 878d7439d0: -100% softirqs.RCU
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 17:30:53 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140120093053.GF18632@localhost> (raw)
Hi Eric,
Just FYI, we noticed the below changes in old commit 878d7439d0 ("rcu:
Fix batch-limit size problem") in test case will-it-scale/open1:
62da1921292ef78 878d7439d0f45a95869e41757
--------------- -------------------------
0.00 ~200% +60900.0% 1.22 ~18% TOTAL perf-profile.cpu-clock.file_free_rcu.rcu_process_callbacks.__do_softirq.call_softirq.do_softirq
0.28 ~126% +339.3% 1.23 TOTAL perf-profile.cpu-clock.__d_lookup_rcu.link_path_walk.do_filp_open.do_sys_open.sys_open
1.16 ~15% -100.0% 0.00 TOTAL perf-profile.cpu-clock.file_free_rcu.rcu_process_callbacks.__do_softirq.run_ksoftirqd.smpboot_thread_fn
1.89e+08 ~14% -100.0% 63093 ~ 6% TOTAL softirqs.RCU
3.66 ~ 7% -100.0% 0.00 TOTAL perf-profile.cpu-clock.rcu_process_callbacks.__do_softirq.run_ksoftirqd.smpboot_thread_fn.kthread
1.29 ~11% -100.0% 0.00 TOTAL perf-profile.cpu-clock.rcu_process_gp_end.isra.23.rcu_process_callbacks.__do_softirq.run_ksoftirqd.smpboot_thread_fn
1.39 ~ 9% -100.0% 0.00 TOTAL perf-profile.cpu-clock.check_for_new_grace_period.isra.25.rcu_process_callbacks.__do_softirq.run_ksoftirqd.smpboot_thread_fn
57276 ~ 9% +110.2% 120367 ~15% TOTAL slabinfo.kmalloc-256.active_objs
3582 ~ 9% +110.0% 7525 ~15% TOTAL slabinfo.kmalloc-256.active_slabs
3582 ~ 9% +110.0% 7525 ~15% TOTAL slabinfo.kmalloc-256.num_slabs
57331 ~ 9% +110.0% 120407 ~15% TOTAL slabinfo.kmalloc-256.num_objs
23741 ~ 6% +71.2% 40652 ~13% TOTAL meminfo.SUnreclaim
19830 ~ 4% -44.1% 11094 ~ 8% TOTAL interrupts.RES
6113 ~ 8% +74.6% 10674 ~12% TOTAL proc-vmstat.nr_slab_unreclaimable
2.44 ~13% +62.9% 3.98 ~13% TOTAL perf-profile.cpu-clock.__slab_alloc.kmem_cache_alloc.get_empty_filp.do_filp_open.do_sys_open
3 ~ 0% -33.3% 2 ~ 0% TOTAL vmstat.procs.r
53183 ~ 3% +31.6% 70006 ~ 8% TOTAL meminfo.Slab
1001 ~ 9% -14.3% 858 ~10% TOTAL slabinfo.kmalloc-128.num_objs
1001 ~ 9% -14.3% 858 ~10% TOTAL slabinfo.kmalloc-128.active_objs
2.47 ~ 7% +12.1% 2.76 ~ 6% TOTAL perf-profile.cpu-clock.__call_rcu.call_rcu_sched.__fput.____fput.task_work_run
6686 ~ 5% -95.9% 272 ~ 3% TOTAL time.involuntary_context_switches
109 ~ 1% +21.3% 132 ~ 1% TOTAL time.system_time
55 ~ 0% +19.6% 66 ~ 0% TOTAL time.percent_of_cpu_this_job_got
899 ~ 3% +10.5% 993 ~ 7% TOTAL vmstat.system.cs
time.system_time
140 ++-------------------------------------------------------------------+
| O O O O |
135 ++ |
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
130 ++ O O O O O O O O O |
| |
125 ++ |
| |
120 ++ |
| |
115 ++ |
| .*. .*. *.. |
110 *+ .*. .*. .*.*.*. .* *.*.*..*.*.*.* *. .*. + .*. |
| * *.*.*. * * * *.* *.* * |
105 ++-------------------------------------------------------------------+
time.percent_of_cpu_this_job_got
66 O+O-O-O-O--O-O-O-O-O-O-O-O--O-O-O-O-O-O-O-O--O-O-O-O-O-O-O-O--O-O-O-O-O
| |
64 ++ |
| |
| |
62 ++ |
| |
60 ++ |
| |
58 ++ |
| * * |
| + + + + |
56 ++ .*.*. + *.*.*.*.* *..*.*. .*. |
*.*.*.*.*..*.*.*.* *.* *.*.*.* *..*.*.* |
54 ++--------------------------------------------------------------------+
time.involuntary_context_switches
9000 ++------------------------------------------------------------------+
| * |
8000 ++ .*.*. .* * *. .*.*. .* *. + + .*. |
7000 *+* * + + + .. * *.*.*.*.* + + *.* *. *. .*.*. |
| * * * * *.* |
6000 ++ |
5000 ++ |
| |
4000 ++ |
3000 ++ |
| |
2000 ++ |
1000 ++ |
| O O O |
0 O+--O-O---O---O-O--O-O-O-O-O-O-O-O-O-O-O-O-O-O-O-O--O-O-O-O-O-O-O-O-O
next reply other threads:[~2014-01-20 9:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-20 9:30 Fengguang Wu [this message]
2014-01-20 17:19 ` [rcu] 878d7439d0: -100% softirqs.RCU Eric Dumazet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140120093053.GF18632@localhost \
--to=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.