Re: [PATCH 1/2] serial: samsung: Move uart_register_driver call to device probe

[Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>]

On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 09:32:06PM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 01:16:01PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 10:05:30AM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 02:32:34PM +0530, Tushar Behera wrote:
> > > > uart_register_driver call binds the driver to a specific device
> > > > node through tty_register_driver call. This should typically happen
> > > > during device probe call.
> > > > 
> > > > In a multiplatform scenario, it is possible that multiple serial
> > > > drivers are part of the kernel. Currently the driver registration fails
> > > > if multiple serial drivers with same default major/minor numbers are
> > > > included in the kernel.
> > > > 
> > > > A typical case is observed with amba-pl011 and samsung-uart drivers.
> > > 
> > > The samsung-uart driver is at fault here - the major/minor numbers were
> > > officially registered to amba-pl011.  Samsung needs to be fixed properly.
> > 
> > I agree, the Samsung driver is "broken" here, but that's no reason why
> > these two drivers can't register with the tty layer _after_ the hardware
> > is detected, and not before.
> > 
> > That saves resources on systems that build the drivers in, yet do not
> > have the hardware present, which is always a good thing.
> 
> Great, so what you're saying is that we need to wait until the first
> device calls into the probe function.  What about removal... how does
> a driver know when it's last device has been removed to de-register
> that?

The "bus" that the device is on handles that, right?

> I guess it needs the driver model to provide some way to know when a
> driver is completely unbound - but isn't that racy?

How is it racy?  That's how the driver model works...

thanks,

greg k-h