From: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
To: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net>
Cc: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>, linux-can@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 5/5] include: Move includes copied from the Linux kernel into include/linux
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 10:53:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140121095337.GR25911@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52DA7106.5000300@hartkopp.net>
On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 01:18:14PM +0100, Oliver Hartkopp wrote:
> On 17.01.2014 21:36, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
>
> >>
> >> https://gitorious.org/linux-can/can-modules
> > Is it a possibility to merge can-modules and can-utils?
>
> NO!
Did I hit another red button? If so I'm sorry, that was not my
intention.
> > Then there would
> > only a single instance of isotp.h be needed.
>
> NO!
?? If can-modules and can-utils were merged both the kernel module and
the userspace stuff could use the same header. I don't understand you
"NO!" here.
> [...]
I don't see a real reason here, but I read between the lines that you
prefer isotp to go into the kernel directly instead of into can-utils
first.
Anyhow, what I care for is to be able to package can-utils for Debian.
That's what I can do once the updated headers hit can-utils so IMO we
can stop arguing even if we don't agree 100%.
@Marc or Oliver: Can you please give me a ping as soon as the headers
hit your public repo. Thanks.
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-21 9:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-16 16:12 [PATCH v5 1/5] License cleanup Marc Kleine-Budde
2014-01-16 16:12 ` [PATCH v5 1/5] include: Remove two unused header files Marc Kleine-Budde
2014-01-16 16:12 ` [PATCH v5 2/5] ioctl.h: drop unused header Marc Kleine-Budde
2014-01-16 16:12 ` [PATCH v5 3/5] isotp.h: add explicit license information Marc Kleine-Budde
2014-01-16 16:12 ` [PATCH v5 4/5] include/socketcan: prepare headers to be moved to include/linux Marc Kleine-Budde
2014-01-16 16:12 ` [PATCH v5 5/5] include: Move includes copied from the Linux kernel into include/linux Marc Kleine-Budde
2014-01-16 19:28 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2014-01-16 22:11 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2014-01-17 13:37 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2014-01-17 14:04 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2014-01-17 20:36 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2014-01-18 12:18 ` Oliver Hartkopp
2014-01-21 9:53 ` Uwe Kleine-König [this message]
2014-01-21 9:59 ` Yegor Yefremov
2014-01-21 10:32 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2014-01-21 11:34 ` Oliver Hartkopp
2014-01-21 11:37 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2014-01-21 11:51 ` Oliver Hartkopp
2014-01-21 12:56 ` Uwe Kleine-König
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140121095337.GR25911@pengutronix.de \
--to=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-can@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mkl@pengutronix.de \
--cc=socketcan@hartkopp.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.