From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mini-os: Fix stubdom build failures on gcc
	4.8
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 18:19:06 +0100
Message-ID: <20140122171906.GT8171@type>
References: <1390410769-2517-1-git-send-email-xenmail43267@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1390410769-2517-1-git-send-email-xenmail43267@gmail.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: xenmail43267@gmail.com
Cc: Ian.Campbell@citrix.com, andrew.cooper3@citrix.com, xen-devel@lists.xen.org, Mike Neilsen <mneilsen@acm.org>, stefano.stabellini@citrix.com, alex.sharp@orionvm.com
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

xenmail43267@gmail.com, le Wed 22 Jan 2014 11:12:49 -0600, a =E9crit :
> index 16a4b49..ce5180c 100644
> --- a/extras/mini-os/pcifront.c
> +++ b/extras/mini-os/pcifront.c
> @@ -424,7 +424,7 @@ int pcifront_physical_to_virtual (struct pcifront_dev=
 *dev,
>                  continue;
>              }
>  =

> -            if (sscanf(s, "%x:%x:%x.%x", dom, bus, slot, fun) !=3D 4) {
> +            if (sscanf(s, "%x:%x:%x.%lx", dom, bus, slot, fun) !=3D 4) {
>                  printk("\"%s\" does not look like a PCI device address\n=
", s);
>                  free(s);
>                  continue;

Rather make fun an unsigned int, there is no reason why it should be an
unsigned long, I'm still wondering where that comes from.

There rest seems OK to me.