From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ken Moffat Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Git v1.9-rc0 Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 20:30:30 +0000 Message-ID: <20140122203030.GB14211@milliways> References: <52DFE882.2040605@atlas-elektronik.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: Vicent =?iso-8859-1?Q?Mart=ED?= , Stefan =?iso-8859-1?Q?N=E4we?= , Javier Domingo Cansino , "git@vger.kernel.org" , Linux Kernel To: Junio C Hamano X-From: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Jan 22 21:30:47 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: glk-linux-kernel-3@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1W64Rg-0003LI-VV for glk-linux-kernel-3@plane.gmane.org; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 21:30:45 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753075AbaAVUae convert rfc822-to-quoted-printable (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Jan 2014 15:30:34 -0500 Received: from know-smtprelay-omc-8.server.virginmedia.net ([80.0.253.72]:38075 "EHLO know-smtprelay-omc-8.server.virginmedia.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752437AbaAVUac (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Jan 2014 15:30:32 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain ([81.106.150.188]) by know-smtprelay-8-imp with bizsmtp id H8WW1n0124481jl018WWJ8; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 20:30:30 +0000 X-Originating-IP: [81.106.150.188] X-Spam: 0 X-Authority: v=2.1 cv=Rs1LLUWK c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=DGj713NdaxKrsjjgQne7PA==:117 a=DGj713NdaxKrsjjgQne7PA==:17 a=LcaDllckn3IA:10 a=uObrxnre4hsA:10 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=NLZqzBF-AAAA:8 a=_TlXeT_K3ZwA:10 a=pGLkceISAAAA:8 a=1XWaLZrsAAAA:8 a=vnrOc9ghOsB5YTOp_nYA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=MSl-tDqOz04A:10 Received: by localhost.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 500) id 3ECA763CC4; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 20:30:30 +0000 (GMT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 10:10:18AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Vicent Mart=C3=AD writes: >=20 > >> Do these consume CPU every time somebody asks for a tarball? That > >> might be considered "wrong" depending on the view. > > > > No, our infrastructure caches frequently requested tarballs so they > > don't have to be regenerated on the fly. >=20 > Thanks. That is certainly good enough for consumers, and better > than having to manually create and upload for me ;-) Two questions: Does regenerating (e.g. if the tarball has dropped out of the cache) change its sums (md5sum or similar) ? In (beyond) linuxfromscratch we use md5sums to verify that a tarball has not changed. Also, will there be links for manpages and htmldocs tarballs ? I note that all of these *are* still available at googlecode for the moment : https://code.google.com/p/git-core/downloads/list =C4=B8en --=20 das eine Mal als Trag=C3=B6die, dieses Mal als Farce