From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alexander GQ Gerasiov Subject: Re: can-utils: install in /usr/bin instead of /usr/local/bin ?? Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2014 01:46:33 +0400 Message-ID: <20140124014633.58e1b389@snail> References: <52E12015.7000201@hartkopp.net> <52E12081.4010301@pengutronix.de> <52E12337.5020207@pengutronix.de> <20140123202612.3ab46825@snail> <52E17C7A.5070209@pengutronix.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eol.lvk.cs.msu.su ([158.250.17.73]:42585 "EHLO eol.lvk.cs.msu.su" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750881AbaAWVxK (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Jan 2014 16:53:10 -0500 In-Reply-To: <52E17C7A.5070209@pengutronix.de> Sender: linux-can-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Marc Kleine-Budde Cc: Yegor Yefremov , Oliver Hartkopp , "linux-can@vger.kernel.org" , Nikita Thu, 23 Jan 2014 21:32:58 +0100 Marc Kleine-Budde wrote: > > So I use plain Makefile in my not-yet-uploaded-into-Debian package. > > > > If you want to get rid of it, I'd recommend you remove it completely > > from git, rename auto* to common name (for now Makefile called > > GNUmakefile or something like that) and remove from git any > > autogenerated files. > > From the GNU make info page: > ""By default, when `make' looks for the makefile, it tries the > following names, in order: `GNUmakefile', `makefile' and `Makefile'."" > > So GNUmakefile has a higher priority as Makefile. Oh, didn't knew that. Ok. > There aren't any auto generated files in the git. Really strange, just tried to reproduce this and didn't find any problems. May be I confuse can-utils with another code, I packaged on the holiday, dont know =\ > Just call: > > ./autogen.sh > ./configure > make In my case there will be just #!/usr/bin/make -f %: dh $@ --with autoreconf in debian/rules :)