From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Hemminger Subject: Re: critic on documentation of the network stack Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2014 15:58:35 -0800 Message-ID: <20140124155835.467deca8@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net> References: <20140124032324.GO7269@order.stressinduktion.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Hannes Frederic Sowa Return-path: Received: from mail-pa0-f44.google.com ([209.85.220.44]:33303 "EHLO mail-pa0-f44.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750872AbaAXX6k (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Jan 2014 18:58:40 -0500 Received: by mail-pa0-f44.google.com with SMTP id kq14so3821404pab.31 for ; Fri, 24 Jan 2014 15:58:39 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20140124032324.GO7269@order.stressinduktion.org> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, 24 Jan 2014 04:23:24 +0100 Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote: > Hello! > > After net-next is closed I wanted to put the following link here: > > The problem I have is more that there are more incorrect sources of documentation and differing opinions on the Internet. Maybe the problem is users, maybe the problem is lack of SEO, or developers not being paid to write documentation, or old web sites not being updated. For example, this commenter obviously never found http://www.lartc.org/