From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
To: Sebastien Godard <sysstat@orange.fr>
Cc: Steve Dickson <SteveD@redhat.com>,
Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>,
varekova@redhat.com,
Linux NFS Mailing List <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Too many programs called nfsiostat.
Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2014 07:45:57 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140126074557.6baf15c8@notabene.brown> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52E3DC2C.1050400@orange.fr>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1685 bytes --]
On Sat, 25 Jan 2014 16:45:48 +0100 Sebastien Godard <sysstat@orange.fr> wrote:
> On 01/25/2014 03:39 PM, Steve Dickson wrote:
> >
> > On 23/01/14 15:12, Sebastien Godard wrote:
> >> On 01/23/2014 06:42 PM, Steve Dickson wrote:
> >>> On 22/01/14 16:52, NeilBrown wrote:
> >>>> On Wed, 22 Jan 2014 08:12:35 -0500 Steve Dickson <SteveD@redhat.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> On 21/01/14 19:24, NeilBrown wrote:
> >>>>> Is this version still actively being maintain?
> >>>> Last change was 5 days ago.
> >>>>
> >>>> https://github.com/sysstat/sysstat/commits/master/nfsiostat.c
> >>> I guess the question now is do they want to continue maintaining
> >>> it or just merge the functionality into the nfs-utils version...
> >>>
> >> This is no longer a question as I already answered it. Please *read* my previous mail.
> > I did... but thought Neil's mail was pointing out that some type of
> > maintenance was happening... But if you say it's "no longer actively being maintained"
> > I'll believe you... :-)
> >
> > So what is the next step to deprecate the nfsiostat in sysstat?
> >
>
> In fact, the various patches applied to nfsiostat over the last few
> years were mainly cosmetic ones (changes in sysstat APIs, etc.)
> So I propose now to simply remove nfsiostat code from sysstat: Next
> sysstat version will rename nfsiostat (eg. to nfsiostat-sysstat) and the
> man page will indicate it is now obsolete and point to the version from
> nfs-utils. Then nfsiostat will be definitively removed sometime before
> the end of this year.
>
> Regards,
>
Fantastic - a nice clear resolution, just what I was hoping for.
Thanks a lot!
NeilBrown
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 828 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-25 20:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-09 23:46 Too man programs calls nfsiostat NeilBrown
2014-01-21 3:00 ` Too many " NeilBrown
2014-01-21 3:45 ` NeilBrown
2014-01-21 15:40 ` Chuck Lever
2014-01-22 0:24 ` Too many programs called nfsiostat NeilBrown
2014-01-22 13:12 ` Steve Dickson
2014-01-22 21:41 ` Sebastien Godard
2014-01-22 21:52 ` NeilBrown
2014-01-23 17:42 ` Steve Dickson
2014-01-23 20:12 ` Sebastien Godard
2014-01-25 14:39 ` Steve Dickson
2014-01-25 15:45 ` Sebastien Godard
2014-01-25 20:45 ` NeilBrown [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140126074557.6baf15c8@notabene.brown \
--to=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=SteveD@redhat.com \
--cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sysstat@orange.fr \
--cc=varekova@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.