From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Qin Chuanyu <qinchuanyu@huawei.com>
Cc: jasowang@redhat.com, Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>,
KVM list <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 8% performance improved by change tap interact with kernel stack
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 10:34:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140128083459.GB16833@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52E766D4.4070901@huawei.com>
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 04:14:12PM +0800, Qin Chuanyu wrote:
> according perf test result,I found that there are 5%-8% cpu cost on
> softirq by use netif_rx_ni called in tun_get_user.
>
> so I changed the function which cause skb transmitted more quickly.
> from
> tun_get_user ->
> netif_rx_ni(skb);
> to
> tun_get_user ->
> rcu_read_lock_bh();
> netif_receive_skb(skb);
> rcu_read_unlock_bh();
>
> The test result is as below:
> CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5620 @ 2.40GHz
> NIC: intel 82599
> Host OS/Guest OS:suse11sp3
> Qemu-1.6
> netperf udp 512(VM tx)
> test model: VM->host->host
>
> modified before : 2.00Gbps 461146pps
> modified after : 2.16Gbps 498782pps
>
> 8% performance gained from this change,
> Is there any problem for this patch ?
I think it's okay - IIUC this way we are processing xmit directly
instead of going through softirq.
Was meaning to try this - I'm glad you are looking into this.
Could you please check latency results?
--
MST
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-28 8:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-28 8:14 8% performance improved by change tap interact with kernel stack Qin Chuanyu
2014-01-28 8:34 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2014-01-28 9:14 ` Qin Chuanyu
2014-01-28 9:41 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-01-28 10:19 ` Qin Chuanyu
2014-01-28 10:33 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-01-28 16:58 ` Stephen Hemminger
2014-01-28 17:18 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-01-29 7:41 ` Qin Chuanyu
2014-01-29 7:56 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-01-28 16:56 ` Rick Jones
2014-01-28 14:49 ` Eric Dumazet
2014-01-29 7:12 ` Qin Chuanyu
2014-02-11 13:21 ` Qin Chuanyu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140128083459.GB16833@redhat.com \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=qinchuanyu@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.