From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>
To: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@hp.com>
Cc: Darren Hart <dvhart@linux.intel.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com,
peterz@infradead.org, tglx@linutronix.de, jason.low2@hp.com,
Waiman.Long@hp.com, scott.norton@hp.com, aswin@hp.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] perf-bench: introduce futex microbenchmarks
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 09:12:36 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140128121236.GC3998@ghostprotocols.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1390882362.27421.22.camel@buesod1.americas.hpqcorp.net>
Em Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 08:12:42PM -0800, Davidlohr Bueso escreveu:
> On Fri, 2014-01-24 at 10:13 -0800, Darren Hart wrote:
> > I agree that we should take whatever makes sense for perf out of
> > futex-test and merge it with perf. It will see greater use and receive
> > more review and improvements than it will in my obscure repository.
> > With trinity covering the fuzz testing and perf handling performance
> > tests, I think futex-test can be reduced down to a functional
> > test-suite, which is perfectly fine with me.
> > If there is still interest here, I'll support it.
> Arnaldo, could you consider this for 3.15? I've also got some additional
> work for perf-bench but am waiting for this to get settled first.
Sure, I'll try applying it later today.
- Arnaldo
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-28 12:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-12-15 4:31 [PATCH 0/3] perf-bench: introduce futex microbenchmarks Davidlohr Bueso
2013-12-15 4:31 ` [PATCH 1/3] perf-bench: add futex-hash microbenchmark Davidlohr Bueso
2014-03-18 8:28 ` [tip:perf/core] perf bench: Add " tip-bot for Davidlohr Bueso
2013-12-15 4:31 ` [PATCH 2/3] perf-bench: add futex-wake microbenchmark Davidlohr Bueso
2013-12-16 5:25 ` Namhyung Kim
2013-12-16 14:45 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2014-03-18 8:28 ` [tip:perf/core] perf bench: Add " tip-bot for Davidlohr Bueso
2013-12-15 4:31 ` [PATCH 3/3] perf-bench: add futex-requeue microbenchmark Davidlohr Bueso
2014-03-18 8:28 ` [tip:perf/core] perf bench: Add " tip-bot for Davidlohr Bueso
2013-12-16 10:08 ` [PATCH 0/3] perf-bench: introduce futex microbenchmarks Ingo Molnar
2013-12-16 14:44 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2014-01-24 18:13 ` Darren Hart
2014-01-28 4:12 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2014-01-28 12:12 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140128121236.GC3998@ghostprotocols.net \
--to=acme@ghostprotocols.net \
--cc=Waiman.Long@hp.com \
--cc=aswin@hp.com \
--cc=davidlohr@hp.com \
--cc=dvhart@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jason.low2@hp.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=scott.norton@hp.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.