From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hfsplus: use xattr handlers for removexattr
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 00:17:55 -0800
Message-ID: <20140130081755.GA664@infradead.org>
References: <20140130075919.GA14438@infradead.org>
 <A6A9CDFF-6EC0-4797-B57D-7B0F630510A9@dubeyko.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
To: Vyacheslav Dubeyko <slava@dubeyko.com>
Return-path: <linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]:50761 "EHLO
	bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1751122AbaA3IR5 (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 30 Jan 2014 03:17:57 -0500
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <A6A9CDFF-6EC0-4797-B57D-7B0F630510A9@dubeyko.com>
Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org>

On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 12:19:48PM +0300, Vyacheslav Dubeyko wrote:
> As I remember, we discussed this changes in the scope of big
> patchset. So, as far as I can judge, you simply decided to extract it
> in one patch. Am I correct?

Well, Al pulled in the earlier version of the patch, so we'll need this
one as a fixup.

> But how is this change safe without generic part of code?
> Especially, for the case of "osx." prefix. Or, maybe, I missed
> some commits in the kernel?

Yeah, the older version got merged via Al's tree.