From: Marc MERLIN <marc_powertop at merlins.org>
To: powertop@lists.01.org
Subject: [Powertop] Stilll seeing bogus wattage reported to USB devices
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 10:23:45 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140130182345.GA26750@merlins.org> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3276 bytes --]
With powertop 2.5, see these 3 report taken a minute apart with no
change of load.
All I did was remove the yubikey and put it back in, and unload wlan0
> Yubikey was showing 6W, so I removed it. that didn't change the discharge rate:
The battery reports a discharge rate of 19.9 W
The estimated remaining time is 3 hours, 23 minutes
Summary: 1196.2 wakeups/second, 74.9 GPU ops/seconds, 0.0 VFS ops/sec and 16.6% CPU use
Power est. Usage Events/s Category Description
10.7 W 48.4 pkts/s Device Network interface: wlan0 (iwlwifi)
2.39 W 57.1% Device Display backlight
2.39 W 17.3% Device Display backlight
395 mW 8.5 ms/s 249.8 Process /usr/local/opt/google/chrome-beta/chrome
363 mW 6.4 ms/s 168.0 Process /usr/local/opt/google/chrome-beta/chrome
226 mW 5.7 ms/s 155.7 Timer hrtimer_wakeup
> So I put the yubikey back and and unloaded wlan0 since it was said to
> take 10W (I knew that was false).
No real change either (little drop from removing wireless, but not 10W)
The battery reports a discharge rate of 17.8 W
The estimated remaining time is 3 hours, 43 minutes
Summary: 1155.3 wakeups/second, 81.8 GPU ops/seconds, 0.0 VFS ops/sec and 7.9% CPU use
Power est. Usage Events/s Category Description
5.90 W 100.0% Device USB device: Yubico
3.15 W 57.1% Device Display backlight
3.15 W 17.3% Device Display backlight
353 mW 3.7 ms/s 170.1 Process /usr/local/opt/google/chrome-beta/chrome
340 mW 13.0 ms/s 252.8 Process /usr/local/opt/google/chrome-beta/chrome
320 mW 6.1 ms/s 238.4 Timer hrtimer_wakeup
> Yubikye is said to take 6W again, really? I know that's a lie. I removed
and power went up 0.4W (normal variance unrelated to yubikey).
The battery reports a discharge rate of 18.2 W
The estimated remaining time is 3 hours, 38 minutes
Summary: 1284.1 wakeups/second, 36.2 GPU ops/seconds, 0.0 VFS ops/sec and
Power est. Usage Events/s Category Description
3.15 W 57.1% Device Display backlight
3.15 W 17.3% Device Display backlight
426 mW 20.8 ms/s 166.8 Process /usr/bin/enlightenm
343 mW 11.8 ms/s 236.3 Process /usr/local/opt/google/chrome-beta/chrome
301 mW 6.3 ms/s 207.0 Timer hrtimer_wakeup
168 mW 2.8 ms/s 115.6 Interrupt PS/2 Touchpad / Keyboard / Mouse
Is anyone closer to fixing this bug? It's impossible to get real battery
usage and due tuning with it present.
Thanks
Marc
--
"A mouse is a device used to point at the xterm you want to type in" - A.S.R.
Microsoft is to operating systems ....
.... what McDonalds is to gourmet cooking
Home page: http://marc.merlins.org/ | PGP 1024R/763BE901
next reply other threads:[~2014-01-30 18:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-30 18:23 Marc MERLIN [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-01-30 21:54 [Powertop] Stilll seeing bogus wattage reported to USB devices Sergey Senozhatsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140130182345.GA26750@merlins.org \
--to=powertop@lists.01.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.