From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Fritz Subject: Re: OMAP: clock DT conversion issues with omap36xx Date: Sat, 1 Feb 2014 19:55:53 +0100 Message-ID: <20140201185553.GB7125@mars> References: <52E697C0.6000202@gmail.com> <1390848104.4936.62.camel@mars> <52E772A3.4090401@ti.com> <1390901735.2963.8.camel@lovely> <52E77D03.8090001@ti.com> <52E7B361.2030601@ti.com> <1390928565.4904.88.camel@mars> <1390994505.5023.32.camel@mars> <52E916BC.5040906@ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <52E916BC.5040906@ti.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Tero Kristo Cc: Tomi Valkeinen , Ivaylo Dimitrov , "linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, pali.rohar@gmail.com, pavel@ucw.cz, Nishanth Menon List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 04:57:00PM +0200, Tero Kristo wrote: > > Hmm, well, the omap96m_alwon_fck rate is still wrong. Try adding > ti,min-div = <2>; and ti,max-div = <4>; to properties of the clock > node. Hmm, doesn't change anything here. Thanks -- Christoph