From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: pza@pengutronix.de (Philipp Zabel) Date: Sat, 1 Feb 2014 22:51:40 +0100 Subject: [PATCH v7 0/7] ARM: rockchip: add smp functionality In-Reply-To: <13010296.nzTT2PqdSR@phil> References: <4970034.fqvMoHdOyd@phil> <13010296.nzTT2PqdSR@phil> Message-ID: <20140201215140.GA1375@pengutronix.de> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Heiko, On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 11:03:03PM +0100, Heiko St?bner wrote: > On Monday, 20. January 2014 16:41:43 Heiko St?bner wrote: > > This series enables the use of the additional cores on Rockchip > > Cortex-A9 SoCs. > > So, two weeks without any general complaints, but I guess part of the more > general patches could use an ack. > > Going forward, what would be best way to merge them? > As one pull request to arm-soc, or for example splitting them into the first > three patches going through the misc tree and the rockchip specific stuff going > through arm-soc? Or something else altogether? > > > > Heiko Stuebner (7): > > of: add functions to count number of elements in a property > > One of the intermediate versions of this patch got a > Reviewed-by: Mark Rutland . > Mark, is this still true for this variant addressing some additional wished > from Rob? > > And this final version got a "Looks good" from Rob Herring in the original > thread, but a more formal "ack" might be nice :-) . > > > > dt-bindings: sram: describe option to reserve parts of the memory > > misc: sram: implement mmio-sram-reserved option > > Philipp, you acked an intermediate version, and this v7 now should also > contain the two separate loops (1st gathering data and 2nd creating the pool > parts) you asked for. > > Could I persuade you to take a look again? Acked-by: Philipp Zabel regards Philipp From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Philipp Zabel Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/7] ARM: rockchip: add smp functionality Date: Sat, 1 Feb 2014 22:51:40 +0100 Message-ID: <20140201215140.GA1375@pengutronix.de> References: <4970034.fqvMoHdOyd@phil> <13010296.nzTT2PqdSR@phil> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <13010296.nzTT2PqdSR@phil> Sender: devicetree-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Heiko =?iso-8859-1?Q?St=FCbner?= Cc: "linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org" , arm-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org, Rob Herring , Philipp Zabel , Mark Rutland , Grant Likely , devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman , Pawel Moll , Stephen Warren , Ian Campbell List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Hi Heiko, On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 11:03:03PM +0100, Heiko St=FCbner wrote: > On Monday, 20. January 2014 16:41:43 Heiko St=FCbner wrote: > > This series enables the use of the additional cores on Rockchip > > Cortex-A9 SoCs. >=20 > So, two weeks without any general complaints, but I guess part of the= more=20 > general patches could use an ack. >=20 > Going forward, what would be best way to merge them? > As one pull request to arm-soc, or for example splitting them into th= e first=20 > three patches going through the misc tree and the rockchip specific s= tuff going=20 > through arm-soc? Or something else altogether? >=20 >=20 > > Heiko Stuebner (7): > > of: add functions to count number of elements in a property >=20 > One of the intermediate versions of this patch got a > Reviewed-by: Mark Rutland . > Mark, is this still true for this variant addressing some additional = wished=20 > from Rob? >=20 > And this final version got a "Looks good" from Rob Herring in the ori= ginal=20 > thread, but a more formal "ack" might be nice :-) . >=20 >=20 > > dt-bindings: sram: describe option to reserve parts of the memory > > misc: sram: implement mmio-sram-reserved option >=20 > Philipp, you acked an intermediate version, and this v7 now should al= so=20 > contain the two separate loops (1st gathering data and 2nd creating t= he pool=20 > parts) you asked for. >=20 > Could I persuade you to take a look again? Acked-by: Philipp Zabel regards Philipp -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" i= n the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933417AbaBAVwJ (ORCPT ); Sat, 1 Feb 2014 16:52:09 -0500 Received: from metis.ext.pengutronix.de ([92.198.50.35]:51563 "EHLO metis.ext.pengutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932200AbaBAVv7 (ORCPT ); Sat, 1 Feb 2014 16:51:59 -0500 Date: Sat, 1 Feb 2014 22:51:40 +0100 From: Philipp Zabel To: Heiko =?iso-8859-1?Q?St=FCbner?= Cc: "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , arm@kernel.org, Rob Herring , Philipp Zabel , Mark Rutland , Grant Likely , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman , Pawel Moll , Stephen Warren , Ian Campbell Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/7] ARM: rockchip: add smp functionality Message-ID: <20140201215140.GA1375@pengutronix.de> References: <4970034.fqvMoHdOyd@phil> <13010296.nzTT2PqdSR@phil> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <13010296.nzTT2PqdSR@phil> X-Sent-From: Pengutronix Hildesheim X-URL: http://www.pengutronix.de/ X-IRC: #ptxdist @freenode X-Accept-Language: de,en X-Accept-Content-Type: text/plain X-Uptime: 22:49:55 up 11 days, 10:18, 9 users, load average: 0,06, 0,18, 0,20 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2001:6f8:1178:2:21e:67ff:fe11:9c5c X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: pza@pengutronix.de X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on metis.ext.pengutronix.de); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-PTX-Original-Recipient: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Heiko, On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 11:03:03PM +0100, Heiko Stübner wrote: > On Monday, 20. January 2014 16:41:43 Heiko Stübner wrote: > > This series enables the use of the additional cores on Rockchip > > Cortex-A9 SoCs. > > So, two weeks without any general complaints, but I guess part of the more > general patches could use an ack. > > Going forward, what would be best way to merge them? > As one pull request to arm-soc, or for example splitting them into the first > three patches going through the misc tree and the rockchip specific stuff going > through arm-soc? Or something else altogether? > > > > Heiko Stuebner (7): > > of: add functions to count number of elements in a property > > One of the intermediate versions of this patch got a > Reviewed-by: Mark Rutland . > Mark, is this still true for this variant addressing some additional wished > from Rob? > > And this final version got a "Looks good" from Rob Herring in the original > thread, but a more formal "ack" might be nice :-) . > > > > dt-bindings: sram: describe option to reserve parts of the memory > > misc: sram: implement mmio-sram-reserved option > > Philipp, you acked an intermediate version, and this v7 now should also > contain the two separate loops (1st gathering data and 2nd creating the pool > parts) you asked for. > > Could I persuade you to take a look again? Acked-by: Philipp Zabel regards Philipp