From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: From: Arnd Bergmann To: Jason Gunthorpe Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH V3 1/4] pci: APM X-Gene PCIe controller driver Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2014 20:22:57 +0100 Cc: Tanmay Inamdar , Bjorn Helgaas , Grant Likely , Rob Herring , Catalin Marinas , Rob Landley , "linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, patches , Jon Masters , Liviu Dudau References: <1390599168-13150-1-git-send-email-tinamdar@apm.com> <4985267.LnsktRmabM@wuerfel> <20140203221559.GG2519@obsidianresearch.com> In-Reply-To: <20140203221559.GG2519@obsidianresearch.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Message-Id: <201402042022.57267.arnd@arndb.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Monday 03 February 2014, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > On Mon, Feb 03, 2014 at 09:12:32PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > Are you sure that is true for the root bridge as well? I don't > > remember the details, but I though that for the host bridge, > > we don't actually look at the BARs at all. > > That is right, but this isn't a host bridge device, it is a PCI-PCI > bridge with root complex registers. The root complex bridge is not the > same as the host bridge. > > Unfortunately the implementation is non-conforming. :( Ok, I see. I was probably asking the wrong question then earlier when I tried to find out what this is. Arnd From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann) Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2014 20:22:57 +0100 Subject: [RFC PATCH V3 1/4] pci: APM X-Gene PCIe controller driver In-Reply-To: <20140203221559.GG2519@obsidianresearch.com> References: <1390599168-13150-1-git-send-email-tinamdar@apm.com> <4985267.LnsktRmabM@wuerfel> <20140203221559.GG2519@obsidianresearch.com> Message-ID: <201402042022.57267.arnd@arndb.de> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Monday 03 February 2014, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > On Mon, Feb 03, 2014 at 09:12:32PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > Are you sure that is true for the root bridge as well? I don't > > remember the details, but I though that for the host bridge, > > we don't actually look at the BARs at all. > > That is right, but this isn't a host bridge device, it is a PCI-PCI > bridge with root complex registers. The root complex bridge is not the > same as the host bridge. > > Unfortunately the implementation is non-conforming. :( Ok, I see. I was probably asking the wrong question then earlier when I tried to find out what this is. Arnd