From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paul Gortmaker Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] tree-wide: clean up no longer required #include Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2014 09:28:25 -0500 Message-ID: <20140205142824.GA23780@windriver.com> References: <1391547118-21967-1-git-send-email-paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> <20140205060633.GE30094@gmail.com> <20140205172723.3fa841793b3fa3f3f534937f@canb.auug.org.au> <20140205064150.GA31568@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140205064150.GA31568@gmail.com> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org To: Ingo Molnar Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Stephen Rothwell , linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org, rusty@rustcorp.com.au, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, Linus Torvalds , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org [Re: [GIT PULL] tree-wide: clean up no longer required #include ] On 05/02/2014 (Wed 07:41) Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > Hi Ingo, > > > > On Wed, 5 Feb 2014 07:06:33 +0100 Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > > > So, if you meant Linus to pull it, you probably want to cite a real > > > Git URI along the lines of: > > > > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/paulg/init.git > > > > Paul provided the proper git url further down in the mail along with the > > usual pull request message (I guess he should have put that bit at the > > top). > > Yeah, indeed, and it even comes with a signed tag, which is an extra > nice touch: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/paulg/linux.git tags/init-cleanup > > (I guess the https was mentioned first to lower expectations.) Just to clarify, the init.git was the repo of raw commits+series file that was used for testing on linux next; now useless, except for showing the last several weeks of history (hence the visual http link). The signed tag [separate repo] is the application of those commits against the 3.14-rc1 tag, which was the end goal from the beginning. Does history matter? In the case of a cleanup like this, it does only in the immediate context of this pull request; to help distinguish this work from some short lived half baked idea that also had its testing invalidated by arbitrarily rebasing onto the latest shiny tag. I wouldn't have even mentioned the patch repo, except for the fact that I know how Linus loves arbitrary rebases [and malformed pull requests] :) Thanks, Paul. -- > > Thanks, > > Ingo From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail1.windriver.com ([147.11.146.13]:38807 "EHLO mail1.windriver.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750799AbaBEO2i (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Feb 2014 09:28:38 -0500 Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2014 09:28:25 -0500 From: Paul Gortmaker Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] tree-wide: clean up no longer required #include Message-ID: <20140205142824.GA23780@windriver.com> References: <1391547118-21967-1-git-send-email-paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> <20140205060633.GE30094@gmail.com> <20140205172723.3fa841793b3fa3f3f534937f@canb.auug.org.au> <20140205064150.GA31568@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140205064150.GA31568@gmail.com> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Stephen Rothwell , Linus Torvalds , sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org, linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, rusty@rustcorp.com.au, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20140205142825.s0dA0Z_sWwcxoMT_xsxG13qEnVDS520C7vBdA8_F2sM@z> [Re: [GIT PULL] tree-wide: clean up no longer required #include ] On 05/02/2014 (Wed 07:41) Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > Hi Ingo, > > > > On Wed, 5 Feb 2014 07:06:33 +0100 Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > > > So, if you meant Linus to pull it, you probably want to cite a real > > > Git URI along the lines of: > > > > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/paulg/init.git > > > > Paul provided the proper git url further down in the mail along with the > > usual pull request message (I guess he should have put that bit at the > > top). > > Yeah, indeed, and it even comes with a signed tag, which is an extra > nice touch: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/paulg/linux.git tags/init-cleanup > > (I guess the https was mentioned first to lower expectations.) Just to clarify, the init.git was the repo of raw commits+series file that was used for testing on linux next; now useless, except for showing the last several weeks of history (hence the visual http link). The signed tag [separate repo] is the application of those commits against the 3.14-rc1 tag, which was the end goal from the beginning. Does history matter? In the case of a cleanup like this, it does only in the immediate context of this pull request; to help distinguish this work from some short lived half baked idea that also had its testing invalidated by arbitrarily rebasing onto the latest shiny tag. I wouldn't have even mentioned the patch repo, except for the fact that I know how Linus loves arbitrary rebases [and malformed pull requests] :) Thanks, Paul. -- > > Thanks, > > Ingo From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paul Gortmaker Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2014 14:28:25 +0000 Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] tree-wide: clean up no longer required #include Message-Id: <20140205142824.GA23780@windriver.com> List-Id: References: <1391547118-21967-1-git-send-email-paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> <20140205060633.GE30094@gmail.com> <20140205172723.3fa841793b3fa3f3f534937f@canb.auug.org.au> <20140205064150.GA31568@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20140205064150.GA31568@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Ingo Molnar Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Stephen Rothwell , linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org, rusty@rustcorp.com.au, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, Linus Torvalds , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org [Re: [GIT PULL] tree-wide: clean up no longer required #include ] On 05/02/2014 (Wed 07:41) Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > Hi Ingo, > > > > On Wed, 5 Feb 2014 07:06:33 +0100 Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > > > So, if you meant Linus to pull it, you probably want to cite a real > > > Git URI along the lines of: > > > > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/paulg/init.git > > > > Paul provided the proper git url further down in the mail along with the > > usual pull request message (I guess he should have put that bit at the > > top). > > Yeah, indeed, and it even comes with a signed tag, which is an extra > nice touch: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/paulg/linux.git tags/init-cleanup > > (I guess the https was mentioned first to lower expectations.) Just to clarify, the init.git was the repo of raw commits+series file that was used for testing on linux next; now useless, except for showing the last several weeks of history (hence the visual http link). The signed tag [separate repo] is the application of those commits against the 3.14-rc1 tag, which was the end goal from the beginning. Does history matter? In the case of a cleanup like this, it does only in the immediate context of this pull request; to help distinguish this work from some short lived half baked idea that also had its testing invalidated by arbitrarily rebasing onto the latest shiny tag. I wouldn't have even mentioned the patch repo, except for the fact that I know how Linus loves arbitrary rebases [and malformed pull requests] :) Thanks, Paul. -- > > Thanks, > > Ingo From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Wed, 05 Feb 2014 15:28:19 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail1.windriver.com ([147.11.146.13]:38795 "EHLO mail1.windriver.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by eddie.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S6823977AbaBEO2Fh9ZQi (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Feb 2014 15:28:05 +0100 Received: from ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (ala-hca.corp.ad.wrs.com [147.11.189.40]) by mail1.windriver.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s15ERolf006649 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Wed, 5 Feb 2014 06:27:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from yow-pgortmak-d1 (128.224.146.65) by ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (147.11.189.40) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.347.0; Wed, 5 Feb 2014 06:27:49 -0800 Received: by yow-pgortmak-d1 (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 32595E1D171; Wed, 5 Feb 2014 09:28:25 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2014 09:28:25 -0500 From: Paul Gortmaker To: Ingo Molnar CC: Stephen Rothwell , Linus Torvalds , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] tree-wide: clean up no longer required #include Message-ID: <20140205142824.GA23780@windriver.com> References: <1391547118-21967-1-git-send-email-paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> <20140205060633.GE30094@gmail.com> <20140205172723.3fa841793b3fa3f3f534937f@canb.auug.org.au> <20140205064150.GA31568@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140205064150.GA31568@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 39219 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: paul.gortmaker@windriver.com Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: linux-mips X-List-ID: linux-mips List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: List-archive: X-list: linux-mips [Re: [GIT PULL] tree-wide: clean up no longer required #include ] On 05/02/2014 (Wed 07:41) Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > Hi Ingo, > > > > On Wed, 5 Feb 2014 07:06:33 +0100 Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > > > So, if you meant Linus to pull it, you probably want to cite a real > > > Git URI along the lines of: > > > > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/paulg/init.git > > > > Paul provided the proper git url further down in the mail along with the > > usual pull request message (I guess he should have put that bit at the > > top). > > Yeah, indeed, and it even comes with a signed tag, which is an extra > nice touch: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/paulg/linux.git tags/init-cleanup > > (I guess the https was mentioned first to lower expectations.) Just to clarify, the init.git was the repo of raw commits+series file that was used for testing on linux next; now useless, except for showing the last several weeks of history (hence the visual http link). The signed tag [separate repo] is the application of those commits against the 3.14-rc1 tag, which was the end goal from the beginning. Does history matter? In the case of a cleanup like this, it does only in the immediate context of this pull request; to help distinguish this work from some short lived half baked idea that also had its testing invalidated by arbitrarily rebasing onto the latest shiny tag. I wouldn't have even mentioned the patch repo, except for the fact that I know how Linus loves arbitrary rebases [and malformed pull requests] :) Thanks, Paul. -- > > Thanks, > > Ingo From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: paul.gortmaker@windriver.com (Paul Gortmaker) Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2014 09:28:25 -0500 Subject: [GIT PULL] tree-wide: clean up no longer required #include In-Reply-To: <20140205064150.GA31568@gmail.com> References: <1391547118-21967-1-git-send-email-paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> <20140205060633.GE30094@gmail.com> <20140205172723.3fa841793b3fa3f3f534937f@canb.auug.org.au> <20140205064150.GA31568@gmail.com> Message-ID: <20140205142824.GA23780@windriver.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org [Re: [GIT PULL] tree-wide: clean up no longer required #include ] On 05/02/2014 (Wed 07:41) Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > Hi Ingo, > > > > On Wed, 5 Feb 2014 07:06:33 +0100 Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > > > So, if you meant Linus to pull it, you probably want to cite a real > > > Git URI along the lines of: > > > > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/paulg/init.git > > > > Paul provided the proper git url further down in the mail along with the > > usual pull request message (I guess he should have put that bit at the > > top). > > Yeah, indeed, and it even comes with a signed tag, which is an extra > nice touch: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/paulg/linux.git tags/init-cleanup > > (I guess the https was mentioned first to lower expectations.) Just to clarify, the init.git was the repo of raw commits+series file that was used for testing on linux next; now useless, except for showing the last several weeks of history (hence the visual http link). The signed tag [separate repo] is the application of those commits against the 3.14-rc1 tag, which was the end goal from the beginning. Does history matter? In the case of a cleanup like this, it does only in the immediate context of this pull request; to help distinguish this work from some short lived half baked idea that also had its testing invalidated by arbitrarily rebasing onto the latest shiny tag. I wouldn't have even mentioned the patch repo, except for the fact that I know how Linus loves arbitrary rebases [and malformed pull requests] :) Thanks, Paul. -- > > Thanks, > > Ingo