From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Robert Richter <rric@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 3/5] x86: Prepare removal of previous_esp from i386 thread_info structure
Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2014 09:41:30 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140206144321.608754481@goodmis.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20140206144127.181568017@goodmis.org
[-- Attachment #1: 0003-x86-Prepare-removal-of-previous_esp-from-i386-thread.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 5720 bytes --]
From: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com>
The i386 thread_info contains a previous_esp field that is used
to daisy chain the different stacks for dump_stack()
(ie. irq, softirq, thread stacks).
The goal is to eventual make i386 handling of thread_info the same
as x86_64, which means that the thread_info will not be in the stack
but as a per_cpu variable. We will no longer depend on thread_info
being able to daisy chain different stacks as it will only exist
in one location (the thread stack).
By moving previous_esp to the end of thread_info and referencing
it as an offset instead of using a thread_info field, this becomes
a stepping stone to moving the thread_info.
The offset to get to the previous stack is rather ugly in this
patch, but this is only temporary and the prev_esp will be changed
in the next commit. This commit is more for sanity checks of the
change.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20110806012353.891757693@goodmis.org
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Robert Richter <rric@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/thread_info.h | 7 ++++---
arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_32.c | 11 ++++++++++-
arch/x86/kernel/irq_32.c | 15 +++++++++++----
arch/x86/kernel/ptrace.c | 8 ++++----
4 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/thread_info.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/thread_info.h
index ee029e4..ed96e37 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/thread_info.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/thread_info.h
@@ -32,13 +32,14 @@ struct thread_info {
mm_segment_t addr_limit;
struct restart_block restart_block;
void __user *sysenter_return;
+ unsigned int sig_on_uaccess_error:1;
+ unsigned int uaccess_err:1; /* uaccess failed */
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
unsigned long previous_esp; /* ESP of the previous stack in
case of nested (IRQ) stacks
+ (Moved to end, to be removed soon)
*/
-#endif
- unsigned int sig_on_uaccess_error:1;
- unsigned int uaccess_err:1; /* uaccess failed */
+#endif
};
#define INIT_THREAD_INFO(tsk) \
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_32.c b/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_32.c
index f2a1770..187d6a7 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_32.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_32.c
@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ void dump_trace(struct task_struct *task, struct pt_regs *regs,
const struct stacktrace_ops *ops, void *data)
{
int graph = 0;
+ u32 *prev_esp;
if (!task)
task = current;
@@ -44,9 +45,17 @@ void dump_trace(struct task_struct *task, struct pt_regs *regs,
((unsigned long)stack & (~(THREAD_SIZE - 1)));
bp = ops->walk_stack(context, stack, bp, ops, data, NULL, &graph);
- stack = (unsigned long *)context->previous_esp;
+ /* Stop if not on irq stack */
+ if (task_stack_page(task) == context)
+ break;
+
+ /* The previous esp is just above the context */
+ prev_esp = (u32 *) ((char *)context + sizeof(struct thread_info) -
+ sizeof(long));
+ stack = (unsigned long *)*prev_esp;
if (!stack)
break;
+
if (ops->stack(data, "IRQ") < 0)
break;
touch_nmi_watchdog();
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/irq_32.c b/arch/x86/kernel/irq_32.c
index d7fcbed..f135cc2 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/irq_32.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/irq_32.c
@@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ static inline int
execute_on_irq_stack(int overflow, struct irq_desc *desc, int irq)
{
union irq_ctx *curctx, *irqctx;
- u32 *isp, arg1, arg2;
+ u32 *isp, *prev_esp, arg1, arg2;
curctx = (union irq_ctx *) current_thread_info();
irqctx = __this_cpu_read(hardirq_ctx);
@@ -98,7 +98,10 @@ execute_on_irq_stack(int overflow, struct irq_desc *desc, int irq)
/* build the stack frame on the IRQ stack */
isp = (u32 *) ((char *)irqctx + sizeof(*irqctx));
irqctx->tinfo.task = curctx->tinfo.task;
- irqctx->tinfo.previous_esp = current_stack_pointer;
+ /* Save the next esp after thread_info */
+ prev_esp = (u32 *) ((char *)irqctx + sizeof(struct thread_info) -
+ sizeof(long));
+ *prev_esp = current_stack_pointer;
if (unlikely(overflow))
call_on_stack(print_stack_overflow, isp);
@@ -149,16 +152,20 @@ void do_softirq_own_stack(void)
{
struct thread_info *curctx;
union irq_ctx *irqctx;
- u32 *isp;
+ u32 *isp, *prev_esp;
curctx = current_thread_info();
irqctx = __this_cpu_read(softirq_ctx);
irqctx->tinfo.task = curctx->task;
- irqctx->tinfo.previous_esp = current_stack_pointer;
/* build the stack frame on the softirq stack */
isp = (u32 *) ((char *)irqctx + sizeof(*irqctx));
+ /* Push the previous esp onto the stack */
+ prev_esp = (u32 *) ((char *)irqctx + sizeof(struct thread_info) -
+ sizeof(long));
+ *prev_esp = current_stack_pointer;
+
call_on_stack(__do_softirq, isp);
}
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/ptrace.c b/arch/x86/kernel/ptrace.c
index 7461f50..f352a7c 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/ptrace.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/ptrace.c
@@ -184,14 +184,14 @@ unsigned long kernel_stack_pointer(struct pt_regs *regs)
{
unsigned long context = (unsigned long)regs & ~(THREAD_SIZE - 1);
unsigned long sp = (unsigned long)®s->sp;
- struct thread_info *tinfo;
+ u32 *prev_esp;
if (context == (sp & ~(THREAD_SIZE - 1)))
return sp;
- tinfo = (struct thread_info *)context;
- if (tinfo->previous_esp)
- return tinfo->previous_esp;
+ prev_esp = (u32 *)(context + sizeof(struct thread_info) - sizeof(long));
+ if (prev_esp)
+ return (unsigned long)prev_esp;
return (unsigned long)regs;
}
--
1.8.4.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-06 14:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-06 14:41 [PATCH 0/5] [GIT PULL] x86: Consolidate 32 and 64 bit thead_info (again) Steven Rostedt
2014-02-06 14:41 ` [PATCH 1/5] x86: Nuke the supervisor_stack field in i386 thread_info Steven Rostedt
2014-03-07 1:00 ` [tip:x86/threadinfo] " tip-bot for Steven Rostedt
2014-02-06 14:41 ` [PATCH 2/5] x86: Nuke GET_THREAD_INFO_WITH_ESP() macro for i386 Steven Rostedt
2014-03-07 1:00 ` [tip:x86/threadinfo] " tip-bot for Steven Rostedt (Red Hat)
2014-02-06 14:41 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2014-03-07 1:01 ` [tip:x86/threadinfo] x86: Prepare removal of previous_esp from i386 thread_info structure tip-bot for Steven Rostedt
2014-02-06 14:41 ` [PATCH 4/5] x86: Keep thread_info on thread stack in x86_32 Steven Rostedt
2014-03-07 1:01 ` [tip:x86/threadinfo] " tip-bot for Steven Rostedt
2014-03-07 7:52 ` [PATCH] x86: redo "x86: Use inline assembler to get sp" Mathias Krause
2014-03-11 0:36 ` [tip:x86/threadinfo] x86, threadinfo: Redo " tip-bot for Mathias Krause
2014-02-06 14:41 ` [PATCH 5/5] x86: Clean up dumpstack_64.c code Steven Rostedt
2014-03-07 1:01 ` [tip:x86/threadinfo] " tip-bot for Steven Rostedt
2014-02-28 13:52 ` [PATCH 0/5] [GIT PULL] x86: Consolidate 32 and 64 bit thead_info (again) Steven Rostedt
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-08-06 1:11 [PATCH 0/4 v2] [GIT PULL][v3.2] x86: Consolidate 32 and 64 bit thread_info Steven Rostedt
2011-08-06 1:11 ` [PATCH 1/4 v2] x86: Nuke the supervisor_stack field in i386 thread_info Steven Rostedt
2011-08-06 1:11 ` [PATCH 2/4 v2] x86: Remove previous_esp from i386 thread_info structure Steven Rostedt
2011-08-06 1:11 ` [PATCH 3/4 v2] x86: Keep thread_info on thread stack in x86_32 Steven Rostedt
2011-08-06 1:11 ` [PATCH 4/4 v2] x86: Clean up dumpstack_64.c code Steven Rostedt
2011-08-06 2:04 ` [PATCH 0/4 v2] [GIT PULL][v3.2] x86: Consolidate 32 and 64 bit thread_info H. Peter Anvin
2011-08-08 21:23 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-08-19 2:01 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-08-19 5:17 ` H. Peter Anvin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140206144321.608754481@goodmis.org \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=brgerst@gmail.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rric@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.