From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [PATCH] backlight: add PWM dependencies Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 10:40:57 +0100 Message-ID: <201402071040.58087.arnd@arndb.de> References: <1391518634-6472-1-git-send-email-linus.walleij@linaro.org> <201402061708.05845.arnd@arndb.de> <000d01cf23b1$7c1f8de0$745ea9a0$%han@samsung.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.186]:59768 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751317AbaBGJla (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Feb 2014 04:41:30 -0500 In-Reply-To: <000d01cf23b1$7c1f8de0$745ea9a0$%han@samsung.com> Sender: linux-pwm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org To: Jingoo Han Cc: 'Thierry Reding' , 'Linus Walleij' , 'Russell King - ARM Linux' , 'Eric Miao' , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org On Friday 07 February 2014, Jingoo Han wrote: > How about the following? > > [PATCH 1/7] ARM: pxa: don't select HAVE_PWM > [PATCH 2/7] ARM: lpc32xx: don't select HAVE_PWM > [PATCH 3/7] ARM: remove HAVE_PWM config option > [PATCH 4/7] MIPS: jz4740: don't select HAVE_PWM > [PATCH 5/7] Input: max8997_haptic: remove HAVE_PWM dependencies > [PATCH 6/7] Input: pwm-beepe: remove HAVE_PWM dependencies > [PATCH 7/7] pwm: don't use IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HAVE_PWM) > > I would like to merge it through PWM tree. > After merging these patches, all HAVE_PWM will be removed from > the mainline kernel. Thank you. :-) Sounds godo to me, thanks a lot for taking care of this! I don't see any inter-dependencies between the various patches, so we could also take the first three through the arm-soc tree to avoid conflicts with other changes (or possibly the third one through rmk's ARM tree, if he prefers). Arnd From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann) Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 10:40:57 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] backlight: add PWM dependencies In-Reply-To: <000d01cf23b1$7c1f8de0$745ea9a0$%han@samsung.com> References: <1391518634-6472-1-git-send-email-linus.walleij@linaro.org> <201402061708.05845.arnd@arndb.de> <000d01cf23b1$7c1f8de0$745ea9a0$%han@samsung.com> Message-ID: <201402071040.58087.arnd@arndb.de> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Friday 07 February 2014, Jingoo Han wrote: > How about the following? > > [PATCH 1/7] ARM: pxa: don't select HAVE_PWM > [PATCH 2/7] ARM: lpc32xx: don't select HAVE_PWM > [PATCH 3/7] ARM: remove HAVE_PWM config option > [PATCH 4/7] MIPS: jz4740: don't select HAVE_PWM > [PATCH 5/7] Input: max8997_haptic: remove HAVE_PWM dependencies > [PATCH 6/7] Input: pwm-beepe: remove HAVE_PWM dependencies > [PATCH 7/7] pwm: don't use IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HAVE_PWM) > > I would like to merge it through PWM tree. > After merging these patches, all HAVE_PWM will be removed from > the mainline kernel. Thank you. :-) Sounds godo to me, thanks a lot for taking care of this! I don't see any inter-dependencies between the various patches, so we could also take the first three through the arm-soc tree to avoid conflicts with other changes (or possibly the third one through rmk's ARM tree, if he prefers). Arnd