From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org (Greg Kroah-Hartman) Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 14:31:01 -0800 Subject: [PATCH v9 0/4] ohci-platform and ehci-plaform patches rebased on 3.14-rc1 In-Reply-To: <1391787403-20961-1-git-send-email-hdegoede@redhat.com> References: <1391787403-20961-1-git-send-email-hdegoede@redhat.com> Message-ID: <20140207223101.GA21062@kroah.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 04:36:39PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi Greg, > > Here is v9 of my ohci-platform and ehci-platform patchset, It is just a > rebase (with some manual conflict resolution), to make it easier for you > to throw this into usb-next, there are no other changes. I've applied these, thanks. I saw a number of older series and revisions, and I assumed this was the latest, right? If not, can you resend anything that I might have missed? thanks, greg k-h From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 0/4] ohci-platform and ehci-plaform patches rebased on 3.14-rc1 Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 14:31:01 -0800 Message-ID: <20140207223101.GA21062@kroah.com> References: <1391787403-20961-1-git-send-email-hdegoede@redhat.com> Reply-To: linux-sunxi-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1391787403-20961-1-git-send-email-hdegoede-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: linux-sunxi-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Disposition: inline To: Hans de Goede Cc: Alan Stern , Tony Prisk , linux-usb , Maxime Ripard , linux-sunxi-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org, linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, devicetree List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 04:36:39PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi Greg, > > Here is v9 of my ohci-platform and ehci-platform patchset, It is just a > rebase (with some manual conflict resolution), to make it easier for you > to throw this into usb-next, there are no other changes. I've applied these, thanks. I saw a number of older series and revisions, and I assumed this was the latest, right? If not, can you resend anything that I might have missed? thanks, greg k-h