From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/11] smp: Remove wait argument from __smp_call_function_single()
Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2014 17:46:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140208164633.GA21882@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140208164247.GA11028@infradead.org>
On Sat, Feb 08, 2014 at 08:42:47AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Might be worth to give the function a saner name than just the __-prefix
> if you touch all callers anyway.
>
Good point. How about smp_call_function_single_async() ?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-08 16:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-08 16:18 [RFC PATCH 00/11] smp: Single IPI cleanups Frederic Weisbecker
2014-02-08 16:18 ` [PATCH 01/11] block: Stop abusing csd.list for fifo_time Frederic Weisbecker
2014-02-08 16:18 ` [PATCH 02/11] block: Remove useless IPI struct initialization Frederic Weisbecker
2014-02-10 20:21 ` Jan Kara
2014-02-08 16:18 ` [PATCH 03/11] block: Stop abusing rq->csd.list in blk-softirq Frederic Weisbecker
2014-02-08 16:18 ` [PATCH 04/11] smp: Iterate functions through llist_for_each_entry_safe() Frederic Weisbecker
2014-02-08 16:18 ` [PATCH 05/11] smp: Remove unused list_head from csd Frederic Weisbecker
2014-02-08 16:18 ` [PATCH 06/11] smp: Teach __smp_call_function_single() to check for offline cpus Frederic Weisbecker
2014-02-08 16:18 ` [PATCH 07/11] smp: Consolidate the various smp_call_function_single() declensions Frederic Weisbecker
2014-02-10 20:27 ` Jan Kara
2014-02-08 16:18 ` [PATCH 08/11] smp: Move __smp_call_function_single() below its safe version Frederic Weisbecker
2014-02-10 20:29 ` Jan Kara
2014-02-08 16:18 ` [PATCH 09/11] watchdog: Simplify a little the IPI call Frederic Weisbecker
2014-02-10 12:26 ` Michal Hocko
2014-02-10 14:46 ` Don Zickus
2014-02-08 16:18 ` [PATCH 10/11] smp: Remove wait argument from __smp_call_function_single() Frederic Weisbecker
2014-02-08 16:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-02-08 16:46 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2014-02-08 16:54 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-02-08 16:18 ` [PATCH 11/11] smp: Enhance and precise the role & requirements of __smp_call_function_single() Frederic Weisbecker
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-02-24 15:39 [PATCH 00/11] smp: Single IPI cleanups v2 Frederic Weisbecker
2014-02-24 15:40 ` [PATCH 10/11] smp: Remove wait argument from __smp_call_function_single() Frederic Weisbecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140208164633.GA21882@localhost.localdomain \
--to=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.